public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] match.pd: Optimize (x & y) == x into (x & ~y) == 0 [PR94589]
Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 09:34:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210511073405.GE1179226@tucnak> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4139aa5f-e3c3-c1ce-7fc3-a1e41a4d4c20@hippo.saclay.inria.fr>

On Thu, May 06, 2021 at 09:42:41PM +0200, Marc Glisse wrote:
> We can probably do it in 2 steps, first something like
> 
> (for cmp (eq ne)
>  (simplify
>   (cmp (bit_and:c @0 @1) @0)
>   (cmp (@0 (bit_not! @1)) { build_zero_cst (TREE_TYPE (@0)); })))
> 
> to get rid of the double use, and then simplify X&C==0 to X<=~C if C is a
> mask 111...000 (I thought we already had a function to detect such masks, or
> the 000...111, but I can't find them anymore).

Ok, here is the first step then.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?

Or should it have cmp:c too given that == and != are commutative too?

2021-05-11  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>
	    Marc Glisse  <marc.glisse@inria.fr>

	PR tree-optimization/94589
	* match.pd ((X & Y) == Y -> (X & ~Y) == 0,
	(X | Y) == Y -> (X & ~Y) == 0): New GIMPLE simplifications.

	* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr94589-1.c: New test.

--- gcc/match.pd.jj	2021-04-27 14:46:56.583716888 +0200
+++ gcc/match.pd	2021-05-10 22:31:49.726870421 +0200
@@ -4764,6 +4764,18 @@ (define_operator_list COND_TERNARY
   (cmp:c (bit_xor:c @0 @1) @0)
   (cmp @1 { build_zero_cst (TREE_TYPE (@1)); }))
 
+#if GIMPLE
+ /* (X & Y) == X becomes (X & ~Y) == 0.  */
+ (simplify
+  (cmp (bit_and:c @0 @1) @0)
+  (cmp (bit_and @0 (bit_not! @1)) { build_zero_cst (TREE_TYPE (@0)); }))
+
+ /* (X | Y) == Y becomes (X & ~Y) == 0.  */
+ (simplify
+  (cmp (bit_ior:c @0 @1) @1)
+  (cmp (bit_and @0 (bit_not! @1)) { build_zero_cst (TREE_TYPE (@0)); }))
+#endif
+
  /* (X ^ C1) op C2 can be rewritten as X op (C1 ^ C2).  */
  (simplify
   (cmp (convert?@3 (bit_xor @0 INTEGER_CST@1)) INTEGER_CST@2)
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr94589-1.c.jj	2021-05-10 22:36:10.574130179 +0200
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr94589-1.c	2021-05-10 22:36:17.789054362 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+/* PR tree-optimization/94589 */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-tree-optimized" } */
+
+int
+foo (int x)
+{
+  return (x & 23) == x;
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump " & -24;" "optimized" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not " & 23;" "optimized" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump " == 0" "optimized" } } */
+}
+
+int
+bar (int x)
+{
+  return (x | 137) != 137;
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump " & -138;" "optimized" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not " \\| 137;" "optimized" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump " != 0" "optimized" } } */
+}


	Jakub


  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-11  7:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-04  7:44 [PATCH] phiopt: Optimize (x <=> y) cmp z [PR94589] Jakub Jelinek
2021-05-04  9:42 ` Jonathan Wakely
2021-05-04  9:56   ` Jakub Jelinek
2021-05-05 11:39 ` Richard Biener
2021-05-05 13:18   ` [PATCH] phiopt, v2: " Jakub Jelinek
2021-05-05 14:17     ` Richard Biener
2021-05-05 11:45 ` [PATCH] phiopt: " Marc Glisse
2021-05-05 16:52   ` Jakub Jelinek
2021-05-06 10:22     ` Jakub Jelinek
2021-05-06 19:42       ` Marc Glisse
2021-05-11  7:34         ` Jakub Jelinek [this message]
2021-05-11  8:11           ` [PATCH] match.pd: Optimize (x & y) == x into (x & ~y) == 0 [PR94589] Marc Glisse
2021-05-11  8:20           ` Richard Biener
2021-05-14 17:26         ` [PATCH] phiopt: Optimize (x <=> y) cmp z [PR94589] Jakub Jelinek
2021-05-15 10:09           ` Marc Glisse
2021-05-05 15:45 ` Martin Sebor

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210511073405.GE1179226@tucnak \
    --to=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jwakely@redhat.com \
    --cc=rguenther@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).