From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CB4A386FC00
 for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Wed, 19 May 2021 13:33:18 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 0CB4A386FC00
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none)
 header.from=kernel.crashing.org
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org;
 spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=segher@kernel.crashing.org
Received: from gate.crashing.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id 14JDWE0s021176;
 Wed, 19 May 2021 08:32:14 -0500
Received: (from segher@localhost)
 by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id 14JDWDmc021174;
 Wed, 19 May 2021 08:32:13 -0500
X-Authentication-Warning: gate.crashing.org: segher set sender to
 segher@kernel.crashing.org using -f
Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 08:32:13 -0500
From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
Cc: "Kewen.Lin" <linkw@linux.ibm.com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>, 
 Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com>,
 Bill Schmidt <wschmidt@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vect: Replace hardcoded weight factor with param
Message-ID: <20210519133213.GH10366@gate.crashing.org>
References: <61b73f06-cced-0365-3b16-5c18c0dfc683@linux.ibm.com>
 <CAFiYyc3K=owkuUi6dh_o7kefzZMAsos=E=nDk4okLbr5hGgGNg@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAFiYyc3K=owkuUi6dh_o7kefzZMAsos=E=nDk4okLbr5hGgGNg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL,
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS, TXREP, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR,
 T_SPF_PERMERROR autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-patches>,
 <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-patches>,
 <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 13:33:21 -0000

On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 10:15:49AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 8:20 AM Kewen.Lin <linkw@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> "weight_factor" is kind-of double-speak

"Weighting factor" (with -ing) is a standard term actually.  (But
cost_factor of course is better and avoids all that :-) )


Segher