From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C7C9385802B for ; Thu, 20 May 2021 22:25:56 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 1C7C9385802B Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.crashing.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=segher@kernel.crashing.org Received: from gate.crashing.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id 14KMOtwC009459; Thu, 20 May 2021 17:24:55 -0500 Received: (from segher@localhost) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id 14KMOsmS009458; Thu, 20 May 2021 17:24:54 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: gate.crashing.org: segher set sender to segher@kernel.crashing.org using -f Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 17:24:54 -0500 From: Segher Boessenkool To: Bill Schmidt Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, dje.gcc@gmail.com, jakub@redhat.com, jlaw@tachyum.com, Richard Sandiford Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/57] Support scanning of build-time GC roots in gengtype Message-ID: <20210520222454.GW10366@gate.crashing.org> References: <26d623c5117d22fbaea2ce1a445ba2d32df437ad.1619537141.git.wschmidt@linux.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, TXREP, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR, T_SPF_PERMERROR autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 22:25:57 -0000 On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 11:01:22AM -0500, Bill Schmidt wrote: > Hi!  I'd like to ping this specific patch from the series, which is the > only one remaining that affects common code.  I confess that I don't > know whom to ask for a review for gengtype; I didn't get any good ideas > from MAINTAINERS.  If you know of a good reviewer candidate, please CC > them. Richard is listed as the "gen* on machine desc" maintainer, that might be the closest to this. cc:ed. Segher