From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4714B3865479 for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2021 16:59:53 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 4714B3865479 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.crashing.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=kernel.crashing.org Received: from gate.crashing.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id 15NGwqZ5010163; Wed, 23 Jun 2021 11:58:52 -0500 Received: (from segher@localhost) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id 15NGwpmx010162; Wed, 23 Jun 2021 11:58:51 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: gate.crashing.org: segher set sender to segher@kernel.crashing.org using -f Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2021 11:58:51 -0500 From: Segher Boessenkool To: "Kewen.Lin" Cc: GCC Patches , David Edelsohn , Bill Schmidt , will schmidt , cel@us.ibm.com, Michael Meissner Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: rs6000: Fix typos in float128 ISA3.1 support Message-ID: <20210623165850.GG5077@gate.crashing.org> References: <32c02216-9f50-8b1b-9d5d-43a769c3c149@linux.ibm.com> <20210622185602.GD5077@gate.crashing.org> <2fc5b902-9c0b-89b2-c526-ce6a6f638757@linux.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2fc5b902-9c0b-89b2-c526-ce6a6f638757@linux.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, TXREP, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR, T_SPF_PERMERROR autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2021 16:59:54 -0000 On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 12:17:07PM +0800, Kewen.Lin wrote: > >> +#ifdef FLOAT128_HW_INSNS_ISA3_1 > >> TFtype __floattikf (TItype_ppc) > >> __attribute__ ((__ifunc__ ("__floattikf_resolve"))); > > > > I wonder if we now need TItype_ppc at all anymore, btw? > > Sorry that I don't quite follow this question. I thought it may do the same as just TItype now, but the ifunc stuff probably makes it different still :-) Segher