From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 476733857025 for ; Sat, 3 Jul 2021 15:57:27 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 476733857025 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.crashing.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=kernel.crashing.org Received: from gate.crashing.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id 163FuQT1021515; Sat, 3 Jul 2021 10:56:26 -0500 Received: (from segher@localhost) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id 163FuQ4M021514; Sat, 3 Jul 2021 10:56:26 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: gate.crashing.org: segher set sender to segher@kernel.crashing.org using -f Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2021 10:56:26 -0500 From: Segher Boessenkool To: Peter Bergner Cc: GCC Patches Subject: Re: [PATCH] rs6000: Add MMA __builtin_vsx_lxvp and __builtin_vsx_stxvp built-ins Message-ID: <20210703155626.GH1583@gate.crashing.org> References: <6797c56b-bc5a-2410-4a90-424cda38abaf@linux.ibm.com> <20210701190106.GE1583@gate.crashing.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, TXREP, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR, T_SPF_PERMERROR autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Jul 2021 15:57:28 -0000 On Fri, Jul 02, 2021 at 01:32:45PM -0500, Peter Bergner wrote: > On 7/1/21 2:48 PM, Peter Bergner wrote: > > On 7/1/21 1:01 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > >> The patch is okay for trunk. > > > > Below is the updated patch which is bootstrapping now. I'll commit it > > if it shows no regressions. > > Testing was clean so I pushed it to trunk. > > > > >> For the backports it is okay if Bill has looked at this patch as well. > > > > Bill has not seen the patch. I'm not sure when/if he'll get a chance > > to either. > > Since Bill won't have a chance to look at this, ok for the backport > after a couple of days on trunk? Bill's builtin rewrite is only targeted > for trunk, so it doesn't affect the backport at all. Okay. Thanks! Segher