public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH] c++: aggregate CTAD and brace elision [PR101344]
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2021 15:06:08 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210816190608.1339856-1-ppalka@redhat.com> (raw)

During aggregate CTAD, collect_ctor_idx_types always recurses into a
sub-CONSTRUCTOR, regardless of whether the corresponding pair of braces
was elided in the original initializer.  This causes us to reject some
completely-braced forms of aggregate CTAD as in the first testcase
below, because collect_ctor_idx_types effectively assumes that the given
initializer is always minimally-braced (hence the aggregate deduction
candidate is given a function type that's incompatible with the written
initializer).

This patch fixes this by making reshape_init flag CONSTRUCTORs that
were built to undo brace elision in the original CONSTRUCTOR, so that
collect_ctor_idx_types can determine whether to recurse into a
sub-CONSTRUCTOR by simply inspecting this flag.

This happens to also fix PR101820, which is about aggregate CTAD using
designated initializers, for a similar reason as above.

A tricky case is the "intermediately-braced" initialization of 'e3'
in the first testcase below.  It seems to me we're correct to continue
to reject this according to [over.match.class.deduct]/1 because here
the initializer element {1, 2, 3, 4} corresponds to the subobject E::t,
hence the type T_1 of the first funciton parameter of the aggregate
deduction candidate is T(&&)[2][2] which the argument {1, 2, 3, 4} isn't
compatible with (as opposed to say T(&&)[4]).

Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for
trunk/11?

	PR c++/101344
	PR c++/101820

gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

	* cp-tree.h (CONSTRUCTOR_BRACES_ELIDED_P): Define.
	* decl.c (reshape_init_r): Set it.
	* pt.c (collect_ctor_idx_types): Recurse into a sub-CONSTRUCTOR
	iff CONSTRUCTOR_BRACES_ELIDED_P.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

	* g++.dg/cpp2a/class-deduction-aggr11.C: New test.
	* g++.dg/cpp2a/class-deduction-aggr12.C: New test.
---
 gcc/cp/cp-tree.h                              |  6 ++++
 gcc/cp/decl.c                                 | 18 +++++++++---
 gcc/cp/pt.c                                   |  7 +----
 .../g++.dg/cpp2a/class-deduction-aggr11.C     | 29 +++++++++++++++++++
 .../g++.dg/cpp2a/class-deduction-aggr12.C     | 15 ++++++++++
 5 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/class-deduction-aggr11.C
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/class-deduction-aggr12.C

diff --git a/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h b/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
index bd3f12a393e..8cbf6cc30b0 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
+++ b/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
@@ -4502,6 +4502,12 @@ more_aggr_init_expr_args_p (const aggr_init_expr_arg_iterator *iter)
 #define CONSTRUCTOR_IS_PAREN_INIT(NODE) \
   (CONSTRUCTOR_CHECK(NODE)->base.private_flag)
 
+/* True if reshape_init built this CONSTRUCTOR to undo the brace elision
+   of another CONSTRUCTOR.  This flag is used during C++20 aggregate
+   CTAD.  */
+#define CONSTRUCTOR_BRACES_ELIDED_P(NODE) \
+  (CONSTRUCTOR_CHECK (NODE)->base.protected_flag)
+
 /* True if NODE represents a conversion for direct-initialization in a
    template.  Set by perform_implicit_conversion_flags.  */
 #define IMPLICIT_CONV_EXPR_DIRECT_INIT(NODE) \
diff --git a/gcc/cp/decl.c b/gcc/cp/decl.c
index b3671ee8956..9e257b32e18 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/decl.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/decl.c
@@ -6650,7 +6650,8 @@ reshape_init_r (tree type, reshape_iter *d, tree first_initializer_p,
   /* A non-aggregate type is always initialized with a single
      initializer.  */
   if (!CP_AGGREGATE_TYPE_P (type)
-      /* As is an array with dependent bound.  */
+      /* As is an array with dependent bound, which we can see
+	 during C++20 aggregate CTAD.  */
       || (cxx_dialect >= cxx20
 	  && TREE_CODE (type) == ARRAY_TYPE
 	  && uses_template_parms (TYPE_DOMAIN (type))))
@@ -6767,6 +6768,7 @@ reshape_init_r (tree type, reshape_iter *d, tree first_initializer_p,
      initializer already, and there is not a CONSTRUCTOR, it means that there
      is a missing set of braces (that is, we are processing the case for
      which reshape_init exists).  */
+  bool braces_elided_p = false;
   if (!first_initializer_p)
     {
       if (TREE_CODE (stripped_init) == CONSTRUCTOR)
@@ -6802,17 +6804,25 @@ reshape_init_r (tree type, reshape_iter *d, tree first_initializer_p,
 	warning (OPT_Wmissing_braces,
 		 "missing braces around initializer for %qT",
 		 type);
+      braces_elided_p = true;
     }
 
   /* Dispatch to specialized routines.  */
+  tree new_init;
   if (CLASS_TYPE_P (type))
-    return reshape_init_class (type, d, first_initializer_p, complain);
+    new_init = reshape_init_class (type, d, first_initializer_p, complain);
   else if (TREE_CODE (type) == ARRAY_TYPE)
-    return reshape_init_array (type, d, first_initializer_p, complain);
+    new_init = reshape_init_array (type, d, first_initializer_p, complain);
   else if (VECTOR_TYPE_P (type))
-    return reshape_init_vector (type, d, complain);
+    new_init = reshape_init_vector (type, d, complain);
   else
     gcc_unreachable();
+
+  if (braces_elided_p)
+    if (TREE_CODE (new_init) == CONSTRUCTOR)
+      CONSTRUCTOR_BRACES_ELIDED_P (new_init) = 1;
+
+  return new_init;
 }
 
 /* Undo the brace-elision allowed by [dcl.init.aggr] in a
diff --git a/gcc/cp/pt.c b/gcc/cp/pt.c
index 5ac89901e22..65b06d978b6 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/pt.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/pt.c
@@ -28836,12 +28836,7 @@ collect_ctor_idx_types (tree ctor, tree list, tree elt = NULL_TREE)
     {
       tree ftype = elt ? elt : TREE_TYPE (idx);
       if (BRACE_ENCLOSED_INITIALIZER_P (val)
-	  && CONSTRUCTOR_NELTS (val)
-	  /* As in reshape_init_r, a non-aggregate or array-of-dependent-bound
-	     type gets a single initializer.  */
-	  && CP_AGGREGATE_TYPE_P (ftype)
-	  && !(TREE_CODE (ftype) == ARRAY_TYPE
-	       && uses_template_parms (TYPE_DOMAIN (ftype))))
+	  && CONSTRUCTOR_BRACES_ELIDED_P (val))
 	{
 	  tree subelt = NULL_TREE;
 	  if (TREE_CODE (ftype) == ARRAY_TYPE)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/class-deduction-aggr11.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/class-deduction-aggr11.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..c4806de56af
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/class-deduction-aggr11.C
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+// PR c++/101344
+// { dg-do compile { target c++20 } }
+
+template<class T=void>
+struct A { int m; int t[2]; };
+
+A a1{1, {2, 3}}; // previously rejected
+A a2{1, 2, 3};
+
+struct B { int x, y; };
+
+template<class T=void>
+struct C { int m; struct { int x, y; } t; };
+
+A b1{1, {2, 3}}; // previously rejected
+A b2{1, 2, 3};
+
+template<class T>
+struct D { T t[2]; };
+
+D d1{1, 2};
+D d2{{1, 2}}; // previously rejected
+
+template<class T>
+struct E { T t[2][2]; };
+
+E e1{1, 2, 3, 4};
+E e2{{{1, 2}, {3, 4}}}; // previously rejected
+E e3{{1, 2, 3, 4}}; // { dg-error "deduction|no match" }
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/class-deduction-aggr12.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/class-deduction-aggr12.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..ebe73c1d817
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/class-deduction-aggr12.C
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+// PR c++/101820
+// { dg-do compile { target c++20 } }
+
+struct Inner { int i = 0; };
+
+template <typename T = void>
+struct Outer { Inner s{}; };
+
+Outer o1{ .s = {} };                // works
+Outer o2{ .s = Inner{ .i = 1} };    // works
+Outer o3{ .s = { .i = 1} };         // does not
+
+Outer o4{ .s{} };                   // works
+Outer o5{ .s{Inner{ .i = 1} } };    // works
+Outer o6{ .s{ .i = 1} };            // does not
-- 
2.33.0.rc1


             reply	other threads:[~2021-08-16 19:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-16 19:06 Patrick Palka [this message]
2021-08-16 19:18 ` Marek Polacek
2021-08-16 19:26   ` Patrick Palka
2021-08-16 20:05 ` Jason Merrill

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210816190608.1339856-1-ppalka@redhat.com \
    --to=ppalka@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).