public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: Tobias Burnus <tobias@codesourcery.com>
Cc: gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
	Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>
Subject: Re: [wwwdocs] gcc-12/changes.html: OpenMP 5.1 update (was: [wwwdocs] gcc-12/changes.html: OpenMP - mention masked support)
Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2021 15:44:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210906134403.GY920497@tucnak> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8c3348aa-9bac-5bfc-f4f1-a1e418cca351@codesourcery.com>

On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 03:20:44PM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> On 13.08.21 16:37, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> 
> > Update the OpenMP section again, now that Jakub has added the 'masked'
> > construct.
> > Comments?
> 
> Jakub did comment on IRC that it probably makes sense to do less
> frequent commits.
> Thus, I waited a while and now have an update list. Besides 'masked' it
> now mentions:
> 
> scope construct;  nothing and error directive + primary in proc_bind.
> 
> OK? Comments? Suggestions?
> 
> Tobias
> 
> PS: Also new that the existing 'device' clause now supports the
> modifiers 'device_num' and 'ancestor' and a bunch of bug fixes. While
> very useful, I think those aren't changes.html worthy.

Agreed (especially because the ancestor modifier is only parsing, but
eventually runs into sorry_at for missing reverse_offload support).
Ok, thanks.

	Jakub


  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-06 13:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-13 14:37 [wwwdocs] gcc-12/changes.html: OpenMP - mention masked support Tobias Burnus
2021-09-06 13:20 ` [wwwdocs] gcc-12/changes.html: OpenMP 5.1 update (was: [wwwdocs] gcc-12/changes.html: OpenMP - mention masked support) Tobias Burnus
2021-09-06 13:44   ` Jakub Jelinek [this message]
2023-01-16 23:42 ` [wwwdocs] gcc-12/changes.html: OpenMP - mention masked support Gerald Pfeifer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210906134403.GY920497@tucnak \
    --to=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gerald@pfeifer.com \
    --cc=tobias@codesourcery.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).