public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Martin Sebor <msebor@gmail.com>
Cc: Hongtao Liu <hongtao.liu@intel.com>,
	"Kewen.Lin" <linkw@linux.ibm.com>,
	Bill Schmidt <wschmidt@linux.ibm.com>,
	GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
	David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rs6000/test: Adjust some cases due to O2 vect [PR102658]
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 13:11:02 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211012181102.GJ10333@gate.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d26a772e-fba7-85d1-d959-c11fd6f7969c@gmail.com>

On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 02:07:49PM -0600, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 10/11/21 11:43 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> >I also am okay with this.  If it was decided x86 does not have to deal
> >with these (generic!) problems, then why should we do other people's
> >work?
> 
> I don't know that anything was decided.

It was approved though :-)  I don't know all history behind it.

> I think those changes
> were made in haste, and (as you noted in your review of these
> updates to them), were incomplete (missing comments referencing
> the underlying bugs or limitations).

Yeah.

> Now that we've noticed it
> we should try to fix it.  I'm not expecting you (or Kwen) to do
> other people's work, but it would help to let them/us know that
> there is work for us to do.  I only noticed the problem by luck.

There is still a month of stage 1 to go, and we are getting >50 new
fails every day.  Maybe once that dies down we can report anything :-(


Segher

      parent reply	other threads:[~2021-10-12 18:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-11  2:47 Kewen.Lin
2021-10-11 15:30 ` Segher Boessenkool
2021-10-11 16:23   ` Martin Sebor
2021-10-11 17:43     ` Segher Boessenkool
2021-10-11 20:07       ` Martin Sebor
2021-10-12  2:31         ` Hongtao Liu
2021-10-12 15:49           ` Martin Sebor
2021-10-12 16:18             ` Segher Boessenkool
2021-10-12 17:15               ` Martin Sebor
2021-10-12 17:45                 ` Jeff Law
2021-10-12 18:01                 ` Segher Boessenkool
2021-10-13  3:34             ` Hongtao Liu
2021-10-13  6:29               ` Hongtao Liu
2021-10-13  7:43                 ` Kewen.Lin
2021-10-13 14:36                   ` Martin Sebor
2021-10-14  7:11                   ` [PATCH] Adjust testcase for O2 vectorization liuhongt
2021-10-14  7:52                     ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2021-10-14 10:56                     ` Kewen.Lin
2021-10-15  7:11                       ` Kewen.Lin
2021-10-18  4:47                         ` Hongtao Liu
2021-10-15 15:37                     ` Martin Sebor
2021-10-18  4:38                       ` Hongtao Liu
2021-10-18 15:11                         ` Martin Sebor
2021-10-19  9:03                           ` liuhongt
2021-10-20 11:34                             ` Christophe Lyon
2021-10-21  1:20                               ` Hongtao Liu
2021-10-21  2:06                                 ` Hongtao Liu
2021-10-21  2:07                                   ` Hongtao Liu
2021-10-12 18:11         ` Segher Boessenkool [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211012181102.GJ10333@gate.crashing.org \
    --to=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=dje.gcc@gmail.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=hongtao.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=linkw@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=msebor@gmail.com \
    --cc=wschmidt@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).