From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-wr1-x432.google.com (mail-wr1-x432.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::432])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 317663858C27;
 Wed, 27 Oct 2021 20:46:44 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 317663858C27
Received: by mail-wr1-x432.google.com with SMTP id s14so3365295wrb.3;
 Wed, 27 Oct 2021 13:46:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
 h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to
 :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=Z8PLrLdjkowauFFxwDbUsaZxysLbgnurc2Y/6+f8xdA=;
 b=aoI5miOecHZKJxQLGgDPlcveWODMe7YNAyJ6G1HZaCUbnEyhel95hQ+hoHjVNwjN6j
 sjfW0//SkFMXZmL6dFxMIMCm3fPQPehe26etmRVekPtoCSKx5Ee3SE3zFXILoqsNh5QR
 F0kHVz33wKlid67dMUXbVMgN+2cEVupr4SE5EaYtpz8AW4ok+BdE4gSx8qlBA4PA7jp/
 aaM2921qHEMn6wgcXOarjAnrZirZMAHhNyabHRIlW9B7HRP1xXj6Xfp3pMw56Bj5lqeG
 8kLQluKeMtFu+CZ+2vbRL8WdfW/X5dmsU4VWYyIwJ1R/loarso6cmg4iq8p2waDkMa7N
 S9Yw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Cvs3t3qeqN36csZVkvZh+2pvlsXlC661I4Dsf0REacJrSdjnn
 UT+83mHQvNWF3NgDirn5Q/o=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx4yaiSA/KEx4axlcbUAyn0QR1MBVpkHfSP4DOPmwwiCocBl6kcwL7WNmTVSWMtTenFQ5VrHw==
X-Received: by 2002:adf:cc82:: with SMTP id p2mr1288614wrj.298.1635367603308; 
 Wed, 27 Oct 2021 13:46:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nbbrfq (dynamic-2bq7di4u2lfl4qjka9-pd01.res.v6.highway.a1.net.
 [2001:871:227:33a8:f6a3:c58c:7641:e771])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k15sm920027wrx.13.2021.10.27.13.46.42
 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
 Wed, 27 Oct 2021 13:46:43 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 22:46:38 +0200
From: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com>
To: Harald Anlauf via Fortran <fortran@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc: rep.dot.nop@gmail.com, Harald Anlauf <anlauf@gmx.de>,
 gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR 86935: Bad locus in ASSOCIATE statement
Message-ID: <20211027224638.67766280@nbbrfq>
In-Reply-To: <slca7k$11i7$1@ciao.gmane.io>
References: <CAKwh3qh3KhbcPdm+iDRoJS3s3kHW4vNxuYh1_d4QifruCdJMNQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <9F1BA124-0E74-496E-9AAC-53C86052CF5F@gmail.com>
 <CAKwh3qg+r2i_o_wQzM5PVTjDjPetPDieUwE1qJ35OHTy0J288w@mail.gmail.com>
 <fc7f64e4-7a1f-837e-b334-6d33aa81c8fa@netcologne.de>
 <CAKwh3qhp33vCBTRYu=zpn1w_egt38woYr7O6hJ26G1FCtp9=CQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAC1BbcRS2E2-6pvrjmB7or9V1CyhqUh6WB3QCcc0xM8jB4ODnQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20211027194058.2764dfdb@nbbrfq> <slca7k$11i7$1@ciao.gmane.io>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,
 DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, KAM_SHORT,
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,
 TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-patches>,
 <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-patches>,
 <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 20:46:45 -0000

On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 21:44:52 +0200
Harald Anlauf via Fortran <fortran@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:

> Hi Bernhard,
> 
> Am 27.10.21 um 19:40 schrieb Bernhard Reutner-Fischer via Fortran:
> > AFAICS current trunk still has this issue.
> > Any takers?
> > thanks,  
> 
> can you create a PR tracking this issue?

now https://gcc.gnu.org/PR102973

> 
> AFAICS PR86935 has been fixed for gcc-9+.

Yes, it is a pre existing possible bug that caught my eye when i looked
at that patch, so admittedly unrelated to PR86935.

thanks,