From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh@gotplt.org>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/10] tree-object-size: Support dynamic sizes in conditions
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 16:12:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211123151252.GZ2646553@tucnak> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211109190137.1107736-7-siddhesh@gotplt.org>
On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 12:31:32AM +0530, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
> (object_sizes_execute): Don't insert min/max for dynamic sizes.
I'm worried about this.
I'd say what we might want to do is in the early pass for __bdos
compute actually __bos (i.e. the static one) and add MIN_EXPR/MAX_EXPR
for the result of the __bdos call from the second pass with the
statically computed value.
The reason for the MIN_EXPR/MAX_EXPR stuff is that GIMPLE optimizations
can remove exact ADDR_EXPRs with detailed COMPONENT_REF etc. access paths
in it, so during the late objsz2 pass the subobject modes don't work
reliably anymore. But the subobject knowledge should be the same between
the static and dynamic evaluation...
Jakub
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-23 15:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 97+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-09 19:01 [PATCH 00/10] __builtin_dynamic_object_size Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-11-09 19:01 ` [PATCH 01/10] tree-object-size: Replace magic numbers with enums Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-11-19 16:00 ` Jakub Jelinek
2021-11-09 19:01 ` [PATCH 02/10] tree-object-size: Abstract object_sizes array Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-11-19 16:18 ` Jakub Jelinek
2021-11-19 16:53 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-11-09 19:01 ` [PATCH 03/10] tree-object-size: Use tree instead of HOST_WIDE_INT Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-11-19 17:06 ` Jakub Jelinek
2021-11-19 19:01 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-11-19 19:16 ` Jakub Jelinek
2021-11-22 8:41 ` Richard Biener
2021-11-22 10:11 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-11-22 10:31 ` Jakub Jelinek
2021-11-22 12:00 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-11-22 12:31 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-11-22 12:32 ` Jakub Jelinek
2021-11-23 11:58 ` Jakub Jelinek
2021-11-23 13:33 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-11-09 19:01 ` [PATCH 04/10] tree-object-size: Single pass dependency loop resolution Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-11-23 12:07 ` Jakub Jelinek
2021-11-23 13:44 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-11-23 14:22 ` Jakub Jelinek
2021-11-09 19:01 ` [PATCH 05/10] __builtin_dynamic_object_size: Recognize builtin Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-11-23 12:41 ` Jakub Jelinek
2021-11-23 13:53 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-11-23 14:00 ` Jakub Jelinek
2021-11-09 19:01 ` [PATCH 06/10] tree-object-size: Support dynamic sizes in conditions Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-11-23 15:12 ` Jakub Jelinek [this message]
2021-11-23 15:36 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-11-23 15:38 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-11-23 16:17 ` Jakub Jelinek
2021-11-23 15:52 ` Jakub Jelinek
2021-11-23 16:00 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-11-23 16:19 ` Jakub Jelinek
2021-11-09 19:01 ` [PATCH 07/10] tree-object-size: Handle function parameters Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-11-09 19:01 ` [PATCH 08/10] tree-object-size: Handle GIMPLE_CALL Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-11-09 19:01 ` [PATCH 09/10] tree-object-size: Dynamic sizes for ADDR_EXPR Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-11-09 19:01 ` [PATCH 10/10] tree-object-size: Handle dynamic offsets Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-11-19 15:56 ` [PATCH 00/10] __builtin_dynamic_object_size Jakub Jelinek
2021-11-26 5:28 ` [PATCH v3 0/8] __builtin_dynamic_object_size Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-11-26 5:28 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] tree-object-size: Replace magic numbers with enums Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-11-26 16:46 ` Jakub Jelinek
2021-11-26 17:53 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-11-26 18:01 ` Jakub Jelinek
2021-11-26 5:28 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] tree-object-size: Abstract object_sizes array Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-11-26 16:47 ` Jakub Jelinek
2021-11-26 5:28 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] tree-object-size: Save sizes as trees and support negative offsets Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-11-26 16:56 ` Jakub Jelinek
2021-11-26 17:59 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-11-26 18:04 ` Jakub Jelinek
2021-11-26 18:07 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-11-26 5:28 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] __builtin_dynamic_object_size: Recognize builtin Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-11-26 5:28 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] tree-object-size: Support dynamic sizes in conditions Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-11-26 5:28 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] tree-object-size: Handle function parameters Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-11-26 5:28 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] tree-object-size: Handle GIMPLE_CALL Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-11-26 5:28 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] tree-object-size: Dynamic sizes for ADDR_EXPR Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-11-26 5:38 ` [PATCH v3 0/8] __builtin_dynamic_object_size Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-12-01 14:27 ` [PATCH v4 0/6] __builtin_dynamic_object_size Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-12-01 14:27 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] tree-object-size: Use trees and support negative offsets Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-12-15 15:21 ` Jakub Jelinek
2021-12-15 17:12 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-12-15 18:43 ` Jakub Jelinek
2021-12-16 0:41 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-12-16 15:49 ` Jakub Jelinek
2021-12-16 18:56 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-12-16 21:16 ` Jakub Jelinek
2021-12-01 14:27 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] __builtin_dynamic_object_size: Recognize builtin Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-12-15 15:24 ` Jakub Jelinek
2021-12-16 2:16 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-12-01 14:27 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] tree-object-size: Support dynamic sizes in conditions Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-12-15 16:24 ` Jakub Jelinek
2021-12-15 17:56 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-12-15 18:52 ` Jakub Jelinek
2021-12-01 14:27 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] tree-object-size: Handle function parameters Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-12-01 14:27 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] tree-object-size: Handle GIMPLE_CALL Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-12-01 14:27 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] tree-object-size: Dynamic sizes for ADDR_EXPR Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-12-18 12:35 ` [PATCH v5 0/4] __builtin_dynamic_object_size Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-12-18 12:35 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] tree-object-size: Support dynamic sizes in conditions Siddhesh Poyarekar
2022-01-10 10:37 ` Jakub Jelinek
2022-01-10 23:55 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-12-18 12:35 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] tree-object-size: Handle function parameters Siddhesh Poyarekar
2022-01-10 10:50 ` Jakub Jelinek
2022-01-11 0:32 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-12-18 12:35 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] tree-object-size: Handle GIMPLE_CALL Siddhesh Poyarekar
2022-01-10 11:03 ` Jakub Jelinek
2021-12-18 12:35 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] tree-object-size: Dynamic sizes for ADDR_EXPR Siddhesh Poyarekar
2022-01-10 11:09 ` Jakub Jelinek
2022-01-04 3:24 ` [PING][PATCH v5 0/4] __builtin_dynamic_object_size Siddhesh Poyarekar
2022-01-11 8:57 ` [PATCH v6 " Siddhesh Poyarekar
2022-01-11 8:57 ` [PATCH v6 1/4] tree-object-size: Support dynamic sizes in conditions Siddhesh Poyarekar
2022-01-11 9:43 ` Jakub Jelinek
2022-01-11 9:44 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2022-01-11 8:57 ` [PATCH v6 2/4] tree-object-size: Handle function parameters Siddhesh Poyarekar
2022-01-11 9:44 ` Jakub Jelinek
2022-01-11 8:57 ` [PATCH v6 3/4] tree-object-size: Handle GIMPLE_CALL Siddhesh Poyarekar
2022-01-11 8:57 ` [PATCH v6 4/4] tree-object-size: Dynamic sizes for ADDR_EXPR Siddhesh Poyarekar
2022-01-11 9:47 ` Jakub Jelinek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211123151252.GZ2646553@tucnak \
--to=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=siddhesh@gotplt.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).