From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F3803858414 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2021 22:34:00 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 7F3803858414 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.crashing.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kernel.crashing.org Received: from gate.crashing.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id 1B1MWxgX001248; Wed, 1 Dec 2021 16:32:59 -0600 Received: (from segher@localhost) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id 1B1MWxSr001247; Wed, 1 Dec 2021 16:32:59 -0600 X-Authentication-Warning: gate.crashing.org: segher set sender to segher@kernel.crashing.org using -f Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2021 16:32:59 -0600 From: Segher Boessenkool To: Bill Schmidt Cc: GCC Patches , David Edelsohn Subject: Re: [PATCH] rs6000: Builtins test changes for pragma_misc9.c Message-ID: <20211201223259.GJ614@gate.crashing.org> References: <2ba31ed8-7403-5f23-dbbb-c8d4924b1872@linux.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2ba31ed8-7403-5f23-dbbb-c8d4924b1872@linux.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2021 22:34:01 -0000 On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 10:18:06AM -0600, Bill Schmidt wrote: > Hi! This patch is broken out from the test suite patch for the new > builtins support. This one is just a minor adjustment for the error > message wording. > > Tested on powerpc64le-linux-gnu and powerpc64-linux-gnu (-m32/-m64) > with no regressions. Is this okay for trunk? Okay. Thanks! Segher