From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-wr1-x429.google.com (mail-wr1-x429.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::429])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 593853858016
 for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Fri,  3 Dec 2021 08:37:59 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 593853858016
Received: by mail-wr1-x429.google.com with SMTP id i5so4166407wrb.2
 for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Fri, 03 Dec 2021 00:37:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
 h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to
 :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=5kzheeJOeL/V/3iMJ3htWeDvS/ZqCiuJzMrEBBQM5Z0=;
 b=Kb4rKYiexR7CmG8j2AqGZizXPfIvQDHNBUJfcnHOfwPIDja3EpertbsmLQ/Q8C0OxS
 az7iTxl4l3i/WBEQIIRur+LUe20yfJ7A+I43OpeYtTwTVNN3RkNVPkjnKJVAEZZQQfS4
 cb4A/7vS7CFVbsJ/KTJfhdv9e6b/eRIc8iCkLtc11nZhkM0bEWylSM8OqNyVImUlKV5W
 vq0PvCHXQh3/IsXNJsW/Wk8nP4qxe4hG0AyOE5oTWxkNlyJx8goUXGbE4SQgiIsd/415
 MZB1W18I3OzbKY4bWSvvXgBkd73QYgnvLJw3zp5B8q/sHyk9sX3TK+BhtkHled8qDJ/y
 Z0cw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530/GWlrs6bb9BW9nubQ5VsL4LHgksSfeyP9iSj2yDnwGXSyJre4
 h3HA/lQGKYRf7zC4rmIQJz4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzkxbiBu8xU1fzZbbuLvjLcz2G+nWMZpM93ryXQFxeYN2zzoSzHmPU7aQTJQkta1rO0igBQRw==
X-Received: by 2002:adf:9bdb:: with SMTP id e27mr20424222wrc.417.1638520678457; 
 Fri, 03 Dec 2021 00:37:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nbbrfq (91-119-98-250.dsl.dynamic.surfer.at. [91.119.98.250])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z7sm4231623wmi.33.2021.12.03.00.37.57
 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
 Fri, 03 Dec 2021 00:37:58 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2021 09:37:54 +0100
From: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com>
To: Jan Hubicka via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc: rep.dot.nop@gmail.com, Jan Hubicka <hubicka@kam.mff.cuni.cz>
Subject: Re: Improve -fprofile-report
Message-ID: <20211203093754.73999203@nbbrfq>
In-Reply-To: <20211127155632.GB25962@kam.mff.cuni.cz>
References: <20211127155632.GB25962@kam.mff.cuni.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,
 DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
 SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-patches>,
 <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-patches>,
 <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2021 08:38:00 -0000

On Sat, 27 Nov 2021 16:56:32 +0100
Jan Hubicka via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:

> --- a/gcc/cfghooks.h
> +++ b/gcc/cfghooks.h
> @@ -36,22 +36,25 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3.  If not see
>     and one CFG hook per CFG mode.  */
>  struct profile_record
>  {

> -  /* Likewise for a basic block's successors.  */
> -  int num_mismatched_count_out;
> -  /* A weighted cost of the run-time of the function body.  */
> -  gcov_type_unsigned time;
>    /* A weighted cost of the size of the function body.  */
>    int size;
>    /* True iff this pass actually was run.  */
>    bool run;
> +  bool fdo;
>  };
>  

fdo seems to be unused, does it belong to some other patch?
thanks,