From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D96513858D39 for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2022 21:35:43 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org D96513858D39 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.crashing.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kernel.crashing.org Received: from gate.crashing.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id 20ILYd9n001941; Tue, 18 Jan 2022 15:34:39 -0600 Received: (from segher@localhost) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id 20ILYcGj001940; Tue, 18 Jan 2022 15:34:38 -0600 X-Authentication-Warning: gate.crashing.org: segher set sender to segher@kernel.crashing.org using -f Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2022 15:34:38 -0600 From: Segher Boessenkool To: "Kewen.Lin" , GCC Patches , Bill Schmidt , David Edelsohn , richard.sandiford@arm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] testsuite: Adjust possibly fragile slp-perm-9.c [PR104015] Message-ID: <20220118213438.GC614@gate.crashing.org> References: <508683d0-ab11-c1dd-7a27-1f734328e0c4@linux.ibm.com> <21a0e420-eff3-740a-ace0-842566ff5482@linux.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, KAM_SHORT, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2022 21:35:46 -0000 On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 11:57:32AM +0000, Richard Sandiford wrote: > "Kewen.Lin" writes: > >> PR tree-optimization/104015 > >> * gcc.dg/vect/slp-perm-9.c: Adjust. > >> * gcc.target/powerpc/pr104015-1.c: New test. > >> * gcc.target/powerpc/pr104015-2.c: New test. > OK for the target-independent part, thanks. IMO it's OK independently > of the rs6000 tests. The rs6000 parts are fine as well. Thanks! I see you got rid of the ilp32 tests, I was going to holler about that, there is no reason this should only work (or only be tested) on 64-bit systems :-) Segher