From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DED63888C6B for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 22:18:08 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 8DED63888C6B Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.crashing.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kernel.crashing.org Received: from gate.crashing.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id 22VMH4rd021775; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 17:17:04 -0500 Received: (from segher@localhost) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id 22VMH3U8021772; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 17:17:03 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: gate.crashing.org: segher set sender to segher@kernel.crashing.org using -f Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 17:17:03 -0500 From: Segher Boessenkool To: Jakub Jelinek Cc: bill.schmidt@fastmail.com, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, dje@gmail.com Subject: Re: rs6000 patch ping: [PATCH 8/8] rs6000: Fix some missing built-in attributes [PR104004] Message-ID: <20220331221703.GY614@gate.crashing.org> References: <20220330230726.GX614@gate.crashing.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220330230726.GX614@gate.crashing.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 22:18:10 -0000 On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 06:07:26PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 02:18:00PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 11:50:26AM -0600, Bill Schmidt via Gcc-patches wrote: > > > PR104004 caught some misses on my part in converting to the new built-in > > > function infrastructure. In particular, I forgot to mark all of the "nosoft" > > > built-ins, and one of those should also have been marked "no32bit". > > > This patch fixes a P1 regression and from my (limited) understanding > > doesn't depend on any other patch in the series. > > It depends on 3/8 which was only partially applied (or not at all even?) > It is a mess :-( > > I'll look into it tomorrow. 3/8 wasn't applied at all. I did some surgery to apply this 8/8 though. Segher