From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E1E43838213
 for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Thu, 26 May 2022 17:57:31 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 1E1E43838213
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none)
 header.from=kernel.crashing.org
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org;
 spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kernel.crashing.org
Received: from gate.crashing.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id 24QHuUAt017823;
 Thu, 26 May 2022 12:56:30 -0500
Received: (from segher@localhost)
 by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id 24QHuTmE017822;
 Thu, 26 May 2022 12:56:29 -0500
X-Authentication-Warning: gate.crashing.org: segher set sender to
 segher@kernel.crashing.org using -f
Date: Thu, 26 May 2022 12:56:29 -0500
From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com>
Cc: "Kewen.Lin" <linkw@linux.ibm.com>, HAO CHEN GUI <guihaoc@linux.ibm.com>,
 Peter Bergner <bergner@linux.ibm.com>,
 gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4,
 rs6000] Add V1TI into vector comparison expand [PR103316]
Message-ID: <20220526175629.GR25951@gate.crashing.org>
References: <5e9b4423-b40f-f5e0-15fd-99776c426c32@linux.ibm.com>
 <ef264a3e-cb4d-66dd-fd6e-93a4c0254780@linux.ibm.com>
 <a7cb3408-59ac-78c1-6bf6-ab80edb62a61@linux.ibm.com>
 <5b68d622-20dd-1630-d3f5-a167f7798a3f@linux.ibm.com>
 <CAGWvnymcytckMLTVxr9coXfZz2YC6EVHAixEjRF9tf2xER7Hnw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAGWvnymcytckMLTVxr9coXfZz2YC6EVHAixEjRF9tf2xER7Hnw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL,
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP,
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-patches>,
 <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-patches>,
 <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 May 2022 17:57:32 -0000

On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 09:16:59AM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
> Does Power10 fully support int128 in 32 bit mode?  I would expect no,
> so the additional test is required.

It isn't supported on any 32-bit ABI, Power or not.  It would simplify
many things if it was though!


Segher