From: Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com>
To: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: [PATCH] c++: Fix ICE with -Wmismatched-tags [PR105725]
Date: Fri, 27 May 2022 11:46:47 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220527154647.39582-1-polacek@redhat.com> (raw)
Here we ICE with -Wmismatched-tags on something like
template <class T>
bool B<T, enable_if_t<is_class_v<class T::foo>>>;
Specifically, the "class T::foo" bit. There, class_decl_loc_t::add gets
a TYPENAME_TYPE as TYPE, rather than a class/union type, so checking
TYPE_BEING_DEFINED will crash. I think it's OK to allow a TYPENAME_TYPE to
slip into that function; we just shouldn't consider the 'class' tag redundant
(which works as a 'typename'). In fact, every other compiler *requires* it.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk?
PR c++/105725
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* parser.cc (class_decl_loc_t::add): Check CLASS_TYPE_P.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/warn/Wmismatched-tags-10.C: New test.
---
gcc/cp/parser.cc | 5 +++--
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wmismatched-tags-10.C | 10 ++++++++++
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wmismatched-tags-10.C
diff --git a/gcc/cp/parser.cc b/gcc/cp/parser.cc
index 4b9859543ed..9a9f859974a 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/parser.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/parser.cc
@@ -33666,7 +33666,8 @@ class_decl_loc_t::add (cp_parser *parser, location_t key_loc,
bool key_redundant = (!def_p && !decl_p
&& (decl == type_decl
|| TREE_CODE (decl) == TEMPLATE_DECL
- || TYPE_BEING_DEFINED (type)));
+ || (CLASS_TYPE_P (type)
+ && TYPE_BEING_DEFINED (type))));
if (key_redundant
&& class_key != class_type
@@ -33704,7 +33705,7 @@ class_decl_loc_t::add (cp_parser *parser, location_t key_loc,
}
else
{
- /* TYPE was previously defined in some unknown precompiled hdeader.
+ /* TYPE was previously defined in some unknown precompiled header.
Simply add a record of its definition at an unknown location and
proceed below to add a reference to it at the current location.
(Declarations in precompiled headers that are not definitions
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wmismatched-tags-10.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wmismatched-tags-10.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..d7e10743bb4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wmismatched-tags-10.C
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+// PR c++/105725
+// { dg-do compile { target c++14 } }
+// { dg-options "-Wall -Wmismatched-tags" }
+
+template <bool> struct enable_if;
+template <bool Cond> using enable_if_t = typename enable_if<Cond>::type;
+template <typename> bool is_class_v;
+template <class, class> bool B;
+template <class T>
+bool B<T, enable_if_t<is_class_v<class T::foo>>>;
base-commit: de57440858591a88e8fd7ba2505ca54546c86021
--
2.36.1
next reply other threads:[~2022-05-27 15:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-27 15:46 Marek Polacek [this message]
2022-05-27 15:58 ` Jason Merrill
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220527154647.39582-1-polacek@redhat.com \
--to=polacek@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jason@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).