From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D804395B06F
 for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Thu,  2 Jun 2022 21:31:22 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 6D804395B06F
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none)
 header.from=kernel.crashing.org
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org;
 spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kernel.crashing.org
Received: from gate.crashing.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id 252LULlt019667;
 Thu, 2 Jun 2022 16:30:21 -0500
Received: (from segher@localhost)
 by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id 252LUKHs019666;
 Thu, 2 Jun 2022 16:30:20 -0500
X-Authentication-Warning: gate.crashing.org: segher set sender to
 segher@kernel.crashing.org using -f
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2022 16:30:19 -0500
From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Michael Meissner <meissner@linux.ibm.com>, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org,
 "Kewen.Lin" <linkw@linux.ibm.com>, David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com>,
 Peter Bergner <bergner@linux.ibm.com>,
 Will Schmidt <will_schmidt@vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Ping: [PATCH] Optimize vec_splats of constant V2DI/V2DF
 vec_extract, PR target/99293
Message-ID: <20220602213018.GC25951@gate.crashing.org>
References: <Yn5v9kqBaETg0roR@toto.the-meissners.org>
 <YpkKTC294tc97yl+@toto.the-meissners.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <YpkKTC294tc97yl+@toto.the-meissners.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL,
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS, KAM_NUMSUBJECT, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP,
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-patches>,
 <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-patches>,
 <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2022 21:31:25 -0000

On Thu, Jun 02, 2022 at 03:06:52PM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote:
> Ping patch posted on May 13th:

Are you not going to apply any of Will's suggestions?  They looked solid
to me.


Segher