From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34AB13856257 for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2022 12:54:22 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 34AB13856257 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.crashing.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kernel.crashing.org Received: from gate.crashing.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id 25ECrILp022314; Tue, 14 Jun 2022 07:53:18 -0500 Received: (from segher@localhost) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id 25ECrHCb022312; Tue, 14 Jun 2022 07:53:17 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: gate.crashing.org: segher set sender to segher@kernel.crashing.org using -f Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2022 07:53:17 -0500 From: Segher Boessenkool To: "Kewen.Lin" Cc: GCC Patches , Jan Hubicka , Richard Biener , Richard Sandiford Subject: Re: [PATCH] predict: Adjust optimize_function_for_size_p [PR105818] Message-ID: <20220614125317.GY25951@gate.crashing.org> References: <23b4998b-bbe6-b052-d7f5-5304ee0f46a3@linux.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <23b4998b-bbe6-b052-d7f5-5304ee0f46a3@linux.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2022 12:54:23 -0000 On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 03:57:08PM +0800, Kewen.Lin wrote: > PR target/105818 Change this to something else? It is not a target bug. "middle-end" perhaps? Thanks for fixing this, Segher