public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pierre-Marie de Rodat <derodat@adacore.com>
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: Steve Baird <baird@adacore.com>
Subject: [Ada] Avoid unwanted warnings for statically-known-successful assertions
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2022 07:50:12 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220704075012.GA99099@adacore.com> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 768 bytes --]

The -gnatwc switch enables warnings for test condition outcomes that are
known at compile time. Such warnings are unlikely to be useful in the
case of an assertion expression (or a subexpression thereof), so do not
generate them in that case.

Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed on trunk

gcc/ada/

	* sem_warn.adb (Warn_On_Constant_Valid_Condition): Do not
	generate a warning if the expression in question is an assertion
	expression, or a subexpression thereof. But do call
	Test_Comparison so that it can generate warnings for the cases
	that it generates warnings for.
	* sem_prag.ads: Modify Assertion_Expression_Pragma constant so
	that the predicate Sem_Util.In_Assertion_Expression_Pragma
	returns True for the expression of a Compile_Time_Error pragma.

[-- Attachment #2: patch.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 1281 bytes --]

diff --git a/gcc/ada/sem_prag.ads b/gcc/ada/sem_prag.ads
--- a/gcc/ada/sem_prag.ads
+++ b/gcc/ada/sem_prag.ads
@@ -135,6 +135,7 @@ package Sem_Prag is
       Pragma_Assert_And_Cut            => True,
       Pragma_Assume                    => True,
       Pragma_Check                     => True,
+      Pragma_Compile_Time_Error        => True,
       Pragma_Contract_Cases            => True,
       Pragma_Default_Initial_Condition => True,
       Pragma_Initial_Condition         => True,


diff --git a/gcc/ada/sem_warn.adb b/gcc/ada/sem_warn.adb
--- a/gcc/ada/sem_warn.adb
+++ b/gcc/ada/sem_warn.adb
@@ -3401,9 +3401,14 @@ package body Sem_Warn is
             False_Result => False_Result);
 
          --  Warn on a possible evaluation to False / True in the presence of
-         --  invalid values.
+         --  invalid values. But issue no warning for an assertion expression
+         --  (or a subexpression thereof); in particular, we don't want a
+         --  warning about an assertion that will always succeed.
 
-         if True_Result then
+         if In_Assertion_Expression_Pragma (Op) then
+            null;
+
+         elsif True_Result then
             Error_Msg_N
               ("condition can only be False if invalid values present?c?", Op);
 



                 reply	other threads:[~2022-07-04  7:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220704075012.GA99099@adacore.com \
    --to=derodat@adacore.com \
    --cc=baird@adacore.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).