From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F05DB3858401 for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2022 21:44:14 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org F05DB3858401 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.crashing.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kernel.crashing.org Received: from gate.crashing.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id 279LhE2c012407; Tue, 9 Aug 2022 16:43:14 -0500 Received: (from segher@localhost) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id 279LhDCu012406; Tue, 9 Aug 2022 16:43:13 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: gate.crashing.org: segher set sender to segher@kernel.crashing.org using -f Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2022 16:43:13 -0500 From: Segher Boessenkool To: HAO CHEN GUI Cc: gcc-patches , David , "Kewen.Lin" , Peter Bergner Subject: Re: [PATCH v2, rs6000] Add multiply-add expand pattern [PR103109] Message-ID: <20220809214313.GV25951@gate.crashing.org> References: <9c7df6aa-c768-114e-4b1e-df6ce65a63b9@linux.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9c7df6aa-c768-114e-4b1e-df6ce65a63b9@linux.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2022 21:44:15 -0000 Hi! On Mon, Aug 08, 2022 at 02:04:07PM +0800, HAO CHEN GUI wrote: > This patch adds an expand and several insns for multiply-add with three > 64bit operands. Also for maddld for 32-bit operands. > "maddld %0,%1,%2,%3" > [(set_attr "type" "mul")]) I suppose attr "size" isn't relevant for any of the cpus that implement these instructions? Okay for trunk. Thanks! (The testcase improvements can be done later). Segher