public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: mtsamis <manolis.tsamis@vrull.eu>
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: manolis.tsamis@vrull.eu, christoph.muellner@vrull.eu,
	philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu, jiangning.liu@amperecomputing.com,
	Tamar.Christina@arm.com
Subject: [PATCH] Add pattern to convert vector shift + bitwise and + multiply to vector compare in some cases.
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2022 11:58:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220813095843.1452308-1-manolis.tsamis@vrull.eu> (raw)

When using SWAR (SIMD in a register) techniques a comparison operation within
such a register can be made by using a combination of shifts, bitwise and and
multiplication. If code using this scheme is vectorized then there is potential
to replace all these operations with a single vector comparison, by reinterpreting
the vector types to match the width of the SWAR register.

For example, for the test function packed_cmp_16_32, the original generated code is:

        ldr     q0, [x0]
        add     w1, w1, 1
        ushr    v0.4s, v0.4s, 15
        and     v0.16b, v0.16b, v2.16b
        shl     v1.4s, v0.4s, 16
        sub     v0.4s, v1.4s, v0.4s
        str     q0, [x0], 16
        cmp     w2, w1
        bhi     .L20

with this pattern the above can be optimized to:

        ldr     q0, [x0]
        add     w1, w1, 1
        cmlt    v0.8h, v0.8h, #0
        str     q0, [x0], 16
        cmp     w2, w1
        bhi     .L20

The effect is similar for x86-64.

gcc/ChangeLog:

	* match.pd: Simplify vector shift + bit_and + multiply in some cases.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

	* gcc.target/aarch64/swar_to_vec_cmp.c: New test.

Signed-off-by: mtsamis <manolis.tsamis@vrull.eu>
---
 gcc/match.pd                                  | 57 +++++++++++++++
 .../gcc.target/aarch64/swar_to_vec_cmp.c      | 72 +++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 129 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/swar_to_vec_cmp.c

diff --git a/gcc/match.pd b/gcc/match.pd
index 8bbc0dbd5cd..5c768a94846 100644
--- a/gcc/match.pd
+++ b/gcc/match.pd
@@ -301,6 +301,63 @@ DEFINE_INT_AND_FLOAT_ROUND_FN (RINT)
     (view_convert (bit_and:itype (view_convert @0)
 				 (ne @1 { build_zero_cst (type); })))))))
 
+/* In SWAR (SIMD in a register) code a comparison of packed data can
+   be consturcted with a particular combination of shift, bitwise and,
+   and multiplication by constants.  If that code is vectorized we can
+   convert this pattern into a more efficient vector comparison.  */
+(simplify
+ (mult (bit_and (rshift @0 @1) @2) @3)
+ (with {
+   tree op_type = TREE_TYPE (@0);
+   tree rshift_cst = NULL_TREE;
+   tree bit_and_cst = NULL_TREE;
+   tree mult_cst = NULL_TREE;
+  }
+  /* Make sure we're working with vectors and uniform vector constants.  */
+  (if (VECTOR_TYPE_P (op_type)
+       && (rshift_cst = uniform_integer_cst_p (@1))
+       && (bit_and_cst = uniform_integer_cst_p (@2))
+       && (mult_cst = uniform_integer_cst_p (@3)))
+   /* Compute what constants would be needed for this to represent a packed
+      comparison based on the shift amount denoted by RSHIFT_CST.  */
+   (with {
+     HOST_WIDE_INT vec_elem_bits = vector_element_bits (op_type);
+     HOST_WIDE_INT vec_nelts = TYPE_VECTOR_SUBPARTS (op_type).to_constant ();
+     HOST_WIDE_INT vec_bits = vec_elem_bits * vec_nelts;
+
+     unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT cmp_bits_i, bit_and_i, mult_i;
+     unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT target_mult_i, target_bit_and_i;
+     cmp_bits_i = tree_to_uhwi (rshift_cst) + 1;
+     target_mult_i = (HOST_WIDE_INT_1U << cmp_bits_i) - 1;
+
+     mult_i = tree_to_uhwi (mult_cst);
+     bit_and_i = tree_to_uhwi (bit_and_cst);
+     target_bit_and_i = 0;
+
+     for (unsigned i = 0; i < vec_elem_bits / cmp_bits_i; i++)
+       target_bit_and_i = (target_bit_and_i << cmp_bits_i) | 1U;
+    }
+    (if ((exact_log2 (cmp_bits_i)) >= 0
+	 && cmp_bits_i < HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT
+	 && vec_elem_bits <= HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT
+	 && tree_fits_uhwi_p (rshift_cst)
+	 && tree_fits_uhwi_p (mult_cst)
+	 && tree_fits_uhwi_p (bit_and_cst)
+	 && target_mult_i == mult_i
+	 && target_bit_and_i == bit_and_i)
+     /* Compute the vector shape for the comparison and check if the target is
+	able to expand the comparison with that type.  */
+     (with {
+       tree bool_type = build_nonstandard_boolean_type (cmp_bits_i);
+       int vector_type_nelts = vec_bits / cmp_bits_i;
+       tree vector_type = build_vector_type (bool_type, vector_type_nelts);
+       tree zeros = build_zero_cst (vector_type);
+       tree mask_type = truth_type_for (vector_type);
+      }
+      (if (expand_vec_cmp_expr_p (vector_type, mask_type, LT_EXPR))
+       (view_convert:op_type (lt:mask_type (view_convert:vector_type @0)
+					   { zeros; })))))))))
+
 (for cmp (gt ge lt le)
      outp (convert convert negate negate)
      outn (negate negate convert convert)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/swar_to_vec_cmp.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/swar_to_vec_cmp.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..26f9ad9ef28
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/swar_to_vec_cmp.c
@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -ftree-vectorize" } */
+
+typedef unsigned char uint8_t;
+typedef unsigned short uint16_t;
+typedef unsigned int uint32_t;
+
+/* 8-bit SWAR tests.  */
+
+static uint8_t packed_cmp_8_8(uint8_t a)
+{
+  return ((a >> 7) & 0x1U) * 0xffU;
+}
+
+/* 16-bit SWAR tests.  */
+
+static uint16_t packed_cmp_8_16(uint16_t a)
+{
+  return ((a >> 7) & 0x101U) * 0xffU;
+}
+
+static uint16_t packed_cmp_16_16(uint16_t a)
+{
+  return ((a >> 15) & 0x1U) * 0xffffU;
+}
+
+/* 32-bit SWAR tests.  */
+
+static uint32_t packed_cmp_8_32(uint32_t a)
+{
+  return ((a >> 7) & 0x1010101U) * 0xffU;
+}
+
+static uint32_t packed_cmp_16_32(uint32_t a)
+{
+  return ((a >> 15) & 0x10001U) * 0xffffU;
+}
+
+static uint32_t packed_cmp_32_32(uint32_t a)
+{
+  return ((a >> 31) & 0x1U) * 0xffffffffU;
+}
+
+/* Driver function to test the vectorized code generated for the different
+   packed_cmp variants.  */
+
+#define VECTORIZED_PACKED_CMP(T, FUNC)  	\
+  void vectorized_cmp_##FUNC(T* a, int n)	\
+  {						\
+    n = (n / 32) * 32;				\
+    for(int i = 0; i < n; i += 4)		\
+    {						\
+      a[i + 0] = FUNC(a[i + 0]);		\
+      a[i + 1] = FUNC(a[i + 1]);		\
+      a[i + 2] = FUNC(a[i + 2]);		\
+      a[i + 3] = FUNC(a[i + 3]);		\
+    }						\
+  }
+
+VECTORIZED_PACKED_CMP(uint8_t, packed_cmp_8_8);
+
+VECTORIZED_PACKED_CMP(uint16_t, packed_cmp_8_16);
+VECTORIZED_PACKED_CMP(uint16_t, packed_cmp_16_16);
+
+VECTORIZED_PACKED_CMP(uint32_t, packed_cmp_8_32);
+VECTORIZED_PACKED_CMP(uint32_t, packed_cmp_16_32);
+VECTORIZED_PACKED_CMP(uint32_t, packed_cmp_32_32);
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler {\tcmlt\t} } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {\tushr\t} } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {\tshl\t} } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {\tmul\t} } } */
-- 
2.34.1


             reply	other threads:[~2022-08-13  9:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-13  9:58 mtsamis [this message]
2022-08-18  1:18 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2022-08-18  2:08 ` Andrew Pinski
2022-08-26  9:08 ` Richard Biener
2022-08-26 13:29   ` Tamar Christina
2022-11-22 10:34     ` Philipp Tomsich
2022-11-22 10:57       ` Tamar Christina
2022-11-29 10:11         ` Manolis Tsamis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220813095843.1452308-1-manolis.tsamis@vrull.eu \
    --to=manolis.tsamis@vrull.eu \
    --cc=Tamar.Christina@arm.com \
    --cc=christoph.muellner@vrull.eu \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jiangning.liu@amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).