public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Iain Sandoe <iain@sandoe.co.uk>
Cc: "Kewen.Lin" <linkw@linux.ibm.com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rs6000: Rework option -mpowerpc64 handling [PR106680]
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2022 13:37:58 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220929183758.GB25951@gate.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B3B050DD-C160-442C-BB6C-422937E55E94@sandoe.co.uk>

Hi!

On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 07:25:44PM +0100, Iain Sandoe wrote:
> > On 29 Sep 2022, at 18:04, Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 09:16:33AM +0100, Iain Sandoe wrote:
> >> Which means that we do not report an error, but a warning, and then we force 64b on (taking
> >> the user’s intention to be specified by the explicit ‘-m64’).
> > 
> > And that is wrong.  Any silent overriding of what the user says is bad.
> 
> It is not silent - it warns and then carries on, 

Yes, but I meant the status quo.  We agree :-)

> > Not overriding it (and then later ICEing) is bad as well, so it should
> > be an error here.  And in generic code anyway.
> 
> As noted, if that change is made we will see what the fallout is :)

Hopefully it magically makes everything fine ;-)


Segher

  reply	other threads:[~2022-09-29 18:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-28  5:30 Kewen.Lin
2022-09-28  6:37 ` Iain Sandoe
2022-09-28 16:18   ` Iain Sandoe
2022-09-28 19:09     ` Iain Sandoe
2022-09-29  5:45       ` Kewen.Lin
2022-09-29  8:16         ` Iain Sandoe
2022-09-29  9:12           ` Kewen.Lin
2022-09-29 16:14             ` Iain Sandoe
2022-09-29 17:04           ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-09-29 18:25             ` Iain Sandoe
2022-09-29 18:37               ` Segher Boessenkool [this message]
2022-09-30  9:26                 ` Kewen.Lin
2022-09-29 17:11         ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-09-30 12:15           ` Kewen.Lin
2022-10-03 21:15             ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-10-10  2:15               ` Kewen.Lin
2022-10-10 13:58                 ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-10-12  8:26                   ` Kewen.Lin
2022-09-28 21:30     ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-09-28 23:04       ` Iain Sandoe
2022-09-28 23:16         ` Iain Sandoe
2022-09-29 17:26           ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-09-29 17:18         ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-09-29 18:33           ` Iain Sandoe
2022-09-29 18:50             ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-09-28 22:04 ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-09-29  6:16   ` Kewen.Lin
2022-09-29 18:56     ` Segher Boessenkool

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220929183758.GB25951@gate.crashing.org \
    --to=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=iain@sandoe.co.uk \
    --cc=linkw@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).