public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Malcolm <dmalcolm@redhat.com>
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: David Malcolm <dmalcolm@redhat.com>
Subject: [committed] analyzer: widening_svalues take a function_point rather than a program_point
Date: Tue,  4 Oct 2022 20:24:18 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221005002418.710712-1-dmalcolm@redhat.com> (raw)

Enabling work towrads better call summarization.

Successfully bootstrapped & regrtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
Pushed to trunk as r13-3074-ge6fe02d8322093.

gcc/analyzer/ChangeLog:
	* region-model-manager.cc
	(region_model_manager::get_or_create_widening_svalue): Use a
	function_point rather than a program_point.
	* region-model.cc (selftest::test_widening_constraints): Likewise.
	* region-model.h
	(region_model_manager::get_or_create_widening_svalue): Likewise.
	(model_merger::get_function_point): New.
	* svalue.cc (svalue::can_merge_p): Use a function_point rather
	than a program_point.
	(svalue::can_merge_p): Likewise.
	* svalue.h (widening_svalue::key_t): Likewise.
	(widening_svalue::widening_svalue): Likewise.

Signed-off-by: David Malcolm <dmalcolm@redhat.com>
---
 gcc/analyzer/region-model-manager.cc | 9 +++++----
 gcc/analyzer/region-model.cc         | 2 +-
 gcc/analyzer/region-model.h          | 6 +++++-
 gcc/analyzer/svalue.cc               | 4 ++--
 gcc/analyzer/svalue.h                | 8 ++++----
 5 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/analyzer/region-model-manager.cc b/gcc/analyzer/region-model-manager.cc
index cbda77f3d9c..ed5b9c75910 100644
--- a/gcc/analyzer/region-model-manager.cc
+++ b/gcc/analyzer/region-model-manager.cc
@@ -1143,10 +1143,11 @@ region_model_manager::get_or_create_unmergeable (const svalue *arg)
    and ITER_SVAL at POINT, creating it if necessary.  */
 
 const svalue *
-region_model_manager::get_or_create_widening_svalue (tree type,
-						     const program_point &point,
-						     const svalue *base_sval,
-						     const svalue *iter_sval)
+region_model_manager::
+get_or_create_widening_svalue (tree type,
+			       const function_point &point,
+			       const svalue *base_sval,
+			       const svalue *iter_sval)
 {
   gcc_assert (base_sval->get_kind () != SK_WIDENING);
   gcc_assert (iter_sval->get_kind () != SK_WIDENING);
diff --git a/gcc/analyzer/region-model.cc b/gcc/analyzer/region-model.cc
index 22c52872c3e..e92bba2b438 100644
--- a/gcc/analyzer/region-model.cc
+++ b/gcc/analyzer/region-model.cc
@@ -7956,7 +7956,7 @@ static void
 test_widening_constraints ()
 {
   region_model_manager mgr;
-  program_point point (program_point::origin (mgr));
+  function_point point (program_point::origin (mgr).get_function_point ());
   tree int_0 = build_int_cst (integer_type_node, 0);
   tree int_m1 = build_int_cst (integer_type_node, -1);
   tree int_1 = build_int_cst (integer_type_node, 1);
diff --git a/gcc/analyzer/region-model.h b/gcc/analyzer/region-model.h
index e86720a645c..baac7ba4a12 100644
--- a/gcc/analyzer/region-model.h
+++ b/gcc/analyzer/region-model.h
@@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ public:
 					   const svalue *inner_svalue);
   const svalue *get_or_create_unmergeable (const svalue *arg);
   const svalue *get_or_create_widening_svalue (tree type,
-					       const program_point &point,
+					       const function_point &point,
 					       const svalue *base_svalue,
 					       const svalue *iter_svalue);
   const svalue *get_or_create_compound_svalue (tree type,
@@ -1282,6 +1282,10 @@ struct model_merger
   }
 
   bool mergeable_svalue_p (const svalue *) const;
+  const function_point &get_function_point () const
+  {
+    return m_point.get_function_point ();
+  }
 
   const region_model *m_model_a;
   const region_model *m_model_b;
diff --git a/gcc/analyzer/svalue.cc b/gcc/analyzer/svalue.cc
index f5a5f1c9697..a37c152bb04 100644
--- a/gcc/analyzer/svalue.cc
+++ b/gcc/analyzer/svalue.cc
@@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ svalue::can_merge_p (const svalue *other,
   if (maybe_get_constant () && other->maybe_get_constant ())
     {
       return mgr->get_or_create_widening_svalue (other->get_type (),
-						 merger->m_point,
+						 merger->get_function_point (),
 						 other, this);
     }
 
@@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ svalue::can_merge_p (const svalue *other,
 	&& binop_sval->get_arg1 ()->get_kind () == SK_CONSTANT
 	&& other->get_kind () != SK_WIDENING)
       return mgr->get_or_create_widening_svalue (other->get_type (),
-						 merger->m_point,
+						 merger->get_function_point (),
 						 other, this);
 
   /* Merge: (Widen(existing_val, V), existing_val) -> Widen (existing_val, V)
diff --git a/gcc/analyzer/svalue.h b/gcc/analyzer/svalue.h
index f4cab0d4134..9393d6ec213 100644
--- a/gcc/analyzer/svalue.h
+++ b/gcc/analyzer/svalue.h
@@ -1113,9 +1113,9 @@ public:
   /* A support class for uniquifying instances of widening_svalue.  */
   struct key_t
   {
-    key_t (tree type, const program_point &point,
+    key_t (tree type, const function_point &point,
 	   const svalue *base_sval, const svalue *iter_sval)
-    : m_type (type), m_point (point.get_function_point ()),
+    : m_type (type), m_point (point),
       m_base_sval (base_sval), m_iter_sval (iter_sval)
     {}
 
@@ -1153,12 +1153,12 @@ public:
      DIR_UNKNOWN
     };
 
-  widening_svalue (tree type, const program_point &point,
+  widening_svalue (tree type, const function_point &point,
 		   const svalue *base_sval, const svalue *iter_sval)
   : svalue (complexity::from_pair (base_sval->get_complexity (),
 				   iter_sval->get_complexity ()),
 	    type),
-    m_point (point.get_function_point ()),
+    m_point (point),
     m_base_sval (base_sval), m_iter_sval (iter_sval)
   {
     gcc_assert (base_sval->can_have_associated_state_p ());
-- 
2.26.3


                 reply	other threads:[~2022-10-05  0:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221005002418.710712-1-dmalcolm@redhat.com \
    --to=dmalcolm@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).