public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Cc: Aldy Hernandez <aldyh@redhat.com>, GCC patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Rename nonzero_bits to known_zero_bits.
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 12:44:27 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221021174427.GX25951@gate.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y1LOBd5mLy+7CQ4+@tucnak>

On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 06:51:17PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 11:45:33AM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 03:14:26PM +0200, Aldy Hernandez via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > > 	* asan.cc (handle_builtin_alloca): Rename *nonzero* to *known_zero*.
> > 
> > Our "nonzero" means "not known to be zero", not "known to be zero", so
> > this renaming makes it worse than it was.  Rename it to
> 
> Agreed.
> 
> I think maybe_nonzero_bits would be fine.

Yes, but the shorter nam known_zero is much better.  Converting to that
is a bit more work, cannot really be mechanic: code simplifications are
needed to make things better instead of adding another layer of double
negations, and variable names and comments should be changes as well.

> Anyway, the reason it is called this way is that we have similar APIs
> on the RTL side, nonzero_bits* in rtlanal.cc.

I am well aware ;-)

> So if we rename, it should be renamed consistently.

Yes.


Segher

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-10-21 17:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-21 13:14 Aldy Hernandez
2022-10-21 16:45 ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-10-21 16:51   ` Jakub Jelinek
2022-10-21 16:54     ` Jakub Jelinek
2022-10-21 18:00       ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-11-01 16:33         ` Aldy Hernandez
2022-10-21 17:44     ` Segher Boessenkool [this message]
2022-10-24  7:21 ` Richard Biener

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221021174427.GX25951@gate.crashing.org \
    --to=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=aldyh@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jakub@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).