public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Monakov <amonakov@ispras.ru>
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: Jan Hubicka <hubicka@kam.mff.cuni.cz>,
	Artem Klimov <jakmobius@gmail.com>,
	Alexander Monakov <amonakov@ispras.ru>
Subject: [PATCH] ipa-visibility: remove assert in TLS optimization [PR107353]
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2022 16:52:38 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221026135238.24678-1-amonakov@ispras.ru> (raw)

When upgrading TLS access model based on optimized symbol visibility
status, we attempted to assert that recomputing the model would not
weaken it. It turns out that C, C++, and Fortran front-ends all can
(unintentionally) assign a stronger model than what can be derived
from the declaration.

Let's act conservatively instead of asserting, at least as long as
such pre-existing issues remain.

gcc/ChangeLog:

	PR other/107353
	* ipa-visibility.cc (function_and_variable_visibility):
	Conditionally upgrade TLS model instead of asserting.
---
 gcc/ipa-visibility.cc | 8 ++++++--
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/ipa-visibility.cc b/gcc/ipa-visibility.cc
index 3ed2b7cf6..238f7eb84 100644
--- a/gcc/ipa-visibility.cc
+++ b/gcc/ipa-visibility.cc
@@ -886,8 +886,12 @@ function_and_variable_visibility (bool whole_program)
 	      && vnode->ref_list.referring.length ())
 	    {
 	      enum tls_model new_model = decl_default_tls_model (decl);
-	      gcc_checking_assert (new_model >= decl_tls_model (decl));
-	      set_decl_tls_model (decl, new_model);
+	      STATIC_ASSERT (TLS_MODEL_GLOBAL_DYNAMIC < TLS_MODEL_LOCAL_DYNAMIC);
+	      STATIC_ASSERT (TLS_MODEL_INITIAL_EXEC < TLS_MODEL_LOCAL_EXEC);
+	      /* We'd prefer to assert that recomputed model is not weaker than
+		 what the front-end assigned, but cannot: see PR 107353.  */
+	      if (new_model >= decl_tls_model (decl))
+		set_decl_tls_model (decl, new_model);
 	    }
 	}
     }
-- 
2.37.2


             reply	other threads:[~2022-10-26 13:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-26 13:52 Alexander Monakov [this message]
2022-10-26 15:58 ` Martin Jambor

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221026135238.24678-1-amonakov@ispras.ru \
    --to=amonakov@ispras.ru \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=hubicka@kam.mff.cuni.cz \
    --cc=jakmobius@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).