From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mout-p-102.mailbox.org (mout-p-102.mailbox.org [80.241.56.152]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59F9B3858C00 for ; Sat, 5 Nov 2022 19:19:12 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 59F9B3858C00 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=gdcproject.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gdcproject.org Received: from smtp202.mailbox.org (smtp202.mailbox.org [IPv6:2001:67c:2050:b231:465::202]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-384) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-p-102.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4N4S3J2nPpz9sV7; Sat, 5 Nov 2022 20:19:08 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gdcproject.org; s=MBO0001; t=1667675948; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=IIDiqDZ0wVAYu6OVBT0hgd/M3bVcl+RZdcr4B6U30eQ=; b=y8+EN5NOWS30ovqbvJcyv6+ma1e2C3C8o+iJ0ZvvhOZ2cE6lpMvVfXI83x3je2npFFuLDx sMjPtHqmqICuASg7tuVXgi8F75gIyX2X64C/Lx13jl5fo3AEXBCPuhlaDS0HkVxYkN5Yxk w7HBPpKynFaBAy/H+gRx8KmhIvDBu2Fwyl/WvGrSmOLPdFyj9tNkIz3tGLKKlodhfOYfrQ f+swaM33ZbohbT0+6AzgNAqHK99lQf70BUGxr0jgQ2oEXb7+lFLIC1mgeGyNyEI3OFNk8k w2TSNFfJcSmzrFjeAVwoR+TVcusJq1L/geijU3ub++e0VHhZki/Nb/kAEqz4MQ== From: Iain Buclaw To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Iain Buclaw Subject: [committed] d: Adjust attr_register2.d to pass when compiling with -m32 Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2022 20:19:06 +0100 Message-Id: <20221105191906.3087155-1-ibuclaw@gdcproject.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4N4S3J2nPpz9sV7 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,GIT_PATCH_0,KAM_NUMSUBJECT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Hi, Noticed when running on x86_64-linux-gnu with `-m32', this test triggered a different kind of error. Adjusted the test to use a different register that is common between x86 and x86_64. Bootstrapped and regression tested on x86_64-linux-gnu/-m32/-mx32, committed to mainline. Regards, Iain. --- gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gdc.dg/attr_register2.d: Adjust test. --- gcc/testsuite/gdc.dg/attr_register2.d | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gdc.dg/attr_register2.d b/gcc/testsuite/gdc.dg/attr_register2.d index 9061a643f31..22c518f9033 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/gdc.dg/attr_register2.d +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gdc.dg/attr_register2.d @@ -6,6 +6,6 @@ import gcc.attributes; @register("ebx") extern int var2; // { dg-error "explicit register variable .var2. declared .extern." } -@register("r12") __gshared int var3 = 0x2a; // { dg-error "global register variable has initial value" } +@register("ebp") __gshared int var3 = 0x2a; // { dg-error "global register variable has initial value" } -@register("r12") __gshared int[256] var4 = void; // { dg-error "data type of .var4. isn.t suitable for a register" } +@register("ebp") __gshared int[256] var4 = void; // { dg-error "data type of .var4. isn.t suitable for a register" } -- 2.34.1