From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from zg8tmtyylji0my4xnjeumjiw.icoremail.net (zg8tmtyylji0my4xnjeumjiw.icoremail.net [162.243.161.220]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 847F53830B0A for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 06:46:33 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 847F53830B0A Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=eswincomputing.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=eswincomputing.com Received: from user.DOMAINS (unknown [10.12.130.38]) by app2 (Coremail) with SMTP id EggMCgB3SS7ENXNj83sRAA--.53785S4; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 14:46:28 +0800 (CST) From: zengxiao@eswincomputing.com To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Cc: kito.cheng@gmail.com, andrew@sifive.com, shihua@iscas.ac.cn, cri-sw-toolchain@eswincomputing.com, zengxiao Subject: [PATCH,V1 0/1] RISC-V: Make R_RISCV_SUB6 conforms to riscv abi standard Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2022 14:46:23 +0800 Message-Id: <20221115064624.2352237-1-zengxiao@eswincomputing.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CM-TRANSID:EggMCgB3SS7ENXNj83sRAA--.53785S4 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvdXoWrZryrJrWrZryUuw4UGrWruFg_yoWfKrgEkw 1kZ34xG3y7GanFgayDAr1SvF98KrWxWr9avF15KF15ur4UX34Dt3yDGF10k3WUur1fJrWx GFWfCryIqa4qvjkaLaAFLSUrUUUUUb8apTn2vfkv8UJUUUU8Yxn0WfASr-VFAUDa7-sFnT 9fnUUIcSsGvfJTRUUUbxxFF20E14v26r4j6ryUM7CY07I20VC2zVCF04k26cxKx2IYs7xG 6rWj6s0DM7CIcVAFz4kK6r1j6r18M28lY4IEw2IIxxk0rwA2F7IY1VAKz4vEj48ve4kI8w A2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_tr0E3s1l84ACjcxK6xIIjxv20xvEc7CjxVAFwI0_Gr1j 6F4UJwA2z4x0Y4vEx4A2jsIE14v26rxl6s0DM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVCY1x0267AKxVW0oV Cq3wAS0I0E0xvYzxvE52x082IY62kv0487Mc02F40EFcxC0VAKzVAqx4xG6I80ewAv7VC0 I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUJVWUGwAv7VC2z280aVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1lOx8S6xCaFVCjc4AY6r1j6r 4UM4x0Y48IcxkI7VAKI48JM4x0x7Aq67IIx4CEVc8vx2IErcIFxwAKzVCY07xG64k0F24l c2xSY4AK6svPMxAIw28IcxkI7VAKI48JMxC20s026xCaFVCjc4AY6r1j6r4UMI8I3I0E5I 8CrVAFwI0_Jr0_Jr4lx2IqxVCjr7xvwVAFwI0_JrI_JrWlx4CE17CEb7AF67AKxVWUAVWU twCIc40Y0x0EwIxGrwCI42IY6xIIjxv20xvE14v26r1j6r1xMIIF0xvE2Ix0cI8IcVCY1x 0267AKxVWUJVW8JwCI42IY6xAIw20EY4v20xvaj40_Jr0_JF4lIxAIcVC2z280aVAFwI0_ Jr0_Gr1lIxAIcVC2z280aVCY1x0267AKxVWUJVW8JbIYCTnIWIevJa73UjIFyTuYvjfUOx hLUUUUU X-CM-SenderInfo: p2hqw5xldrqvxvzl0uprps33xlqjhudrp/ X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: From: zengxiao Hi all RISC-V folks: When riscv-objdump is used to generate dwarf information, problems are found, like: DW_CFA_??? (User defined call frame op: 0x3c) This error is related to that riscv-objdump does not follow the riscv R_RISCV_SUB6 standard. Riscv-readelf is correct because it follows the R_RISCV_SUB6 standard. There are test cases in https://github.com/zeng-xiao/gnu-bug-fix/tree/main/EG-769 that describe the error in detail. zengxiao (1): RISC-V: Make R_RISCV_SUB6 conforms to riscv abi standard bfd/elfxx-riscv.c | 7 +++++ .../testsuite/binutils-all/riscv/dwarf-SUB6.d | 31 +++++++++++++++++++ .../testsuite/binutils-all/riscv/dwarf-SUB6.s | 12 +++++++ 3 files changed, 50 insertions(+) create mode 100644 binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/riscv/dwarf-SUB6.d create mode 100644 binutils/testsuite/binutils-all/riscv/dwarf-SUB6.s -- 2.34.1