public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiufu Guo <guojiufu@linux.ibm.com>
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: segher@kernel.crashing.org, dje.gcc@gmail.com, linkw@gcc.gnu.org,
	guojiufu@linux.ibm.com, ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr,
	steven@gcc.gnu.org, rguenther@suse.de, jeffreyalaw@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH V3] Use reg mode to move sub blocks for parameters and returns
Date: Wed,  7 Dec 2022 20:00:08 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221207120008.126895-1-guojiufu@linux.ibm.com> (raw)

Hi,

When assigning a parameter to a variable, or assigning a variable to
return value with struct type, "block move" are used to expand
the assignment. It would be better to use the register mode according
to the target/ABI to move the blocks if the parameter/return is passed
through registers. And then this would raise more opportunities for
other optimization passes(cse/dse/xprop).

As the example code (like code in PR65421):

typedef struct SA {double a[3];} A;
A ret_arg_pt (A *a) {return *a;} // on ppc64le, expect only 3 lfd(s)
A ret_arg (A a) {return a;} // just empty fun body
void st_arg (A a, A *p) {*p = a;} //only 3 stfd(s)

This patches check the "from" and "to" of an assignment in
"expand_assignment", if it is about param/ret which may passing via
register, then use the register mode to move sub-blocks for the
assignning.

This patches are based on the discussions for previous version:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-November/606498.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-November/607480.html

Comparing with previous version, this patch uses a flag to mark if
a parameter is passed via registers and stored to stack. And when
expanding an assignment, this flag is checked.  This could avoid
inaccurate guess during expanding the assignment.  In this version,
testcase pr65421-1.c is updated to remove unnecessary checks.

Bootstrap and regtest pass on ppc64{,le} and x86_64.
Is this ok for trunk?

BR,
Jeff (Jiufu)


	PR target/65421

gcc/ChangeLog:

	* cfgexpand.cc (expand_used_vars): Update to mark DECL_USEDBY_RETURN_P
	for returns.
	* expr.cc (move_sub_blocks): New function.
	(expand_assignment): Update to call move_sub_blocks for returns or
	parameters.
	* function.cc (assign_parm_setup_block): Update to mark
	DECL_STACK_REGS_P for parameter.
	* tree-core.h (struct tree_decl_common): Add comment.
	* tree.h (DECL_USEDBY_RETURN_P): New define.
	(DECL_STACK_REGS_P): New define.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

	* gcc.target/powerpc/pr65421-1.c: New test.
	* gcc.target/powerpc/pr65421.c: New test.

---
 gcc/cfgexpand.cc                             | 14 ++++
 gcc/expr.cc                                  | 81 ++++++++++++++++++++
 gcc/function.cc                              |  3 +
 gcc/tree-core.h                              |  4 +-
 gcc/tree.h                                   |  9 +++
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr65421-1.c | 15 ++++
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr65421.c   | 24 ++++++
 7 files changed, 149 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr65421-1.c
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr65421.c

diff --git a/gcc/cfgexpand.cc b/gcc/cfgexpand.cc
index dd29ffffc03..09b8ec64cea 100644
--- a/gcc/cfgexpand.cc
+++ b/gcc/cfgexpand.cc
@@ -2158,6 +2158,20 @@ expand_used_vars (bitmap forced_stack_vars)
     frame_phase = off ? align - off : 0;
   }
 
+  /* Collect VARs on returns.  */
+  if (DECL_RESULT (current_function_decl))
+    {
+      edge_iterator ei;
+      edge e;
+      FOR_EACH_EDGE (e, ei, EXIT_BLOCK_PTR_FOR_FN (cfun)->preds)
+	if (greturn *ret = safe_dyn_cast<greturn *> (last_stmt (e->src)))
+	  {
+	    tree val = gimple_return_retval (ret);
+	    if (val && VAR_P (val))
+	      DECL_USEDBY_RETURN_P (val) = 1;
+	  }
+    }
+
   /* Set TREE_USED on all variables in the local_decls.  */
   FOR_EACH_LOCAL_DECL (cfun, i, var)
     TREE_USED (var) = 1;
diff --git a/gcc/expr.cc b/gcc/expr.cc
index d9407432ea5..d61669d5662 100644
--- a/gcc/expr.cc
+++ b/gcc/expr.cc
@@ -5559,6 +5559,55 @@ mem_ref_refers_to_non_mem_p (tree ref)
   return non_mem_decl_p (base);
 }
 
+/* Sub routine of expand_assignment, invoked when assigning from a
+   parameter or assigning to a return val on struct type which may
+   be passed through registers.  The mode of register is used to
+   move the content for the assignment.
+
+   This routine generates code for expression FROM which is BLKmode,
+   and move the generated content to TO_RTX by su-blocks in SUB_MODE.  */
+
+static void
+move_sub_blocks (rtx to_rtx, tree from, machine_mode sub_mode, bool nontemporal)
+{
+  HOST_WIDE_INT size, sub_size;
+  int len;
+
+  gcc_assert (MEM_P (to_rtx));
+
+  size = MEM_SIZE (to_rtx).to_constant ();
+  sub_size = GET_MODE_SIZE (sub_mode).to_constant ();
+  len = size / sub_size;
+
+  /* It would be not profitable to move through sub-modes, if the size does
+     not meet register mode.  */
+  if ((size % sub_size) != 0)
+    {
+      push_temp_slots ();
+      rtx result = store_expr (from, to_rtx, 0, nontemporal, false);
+      preserve_temp_slots (result);
+      pop_temp_slots ();
+      return;
+    }
+
+  push_temp_slots ();
+
+  rtx from_rtx;
+  from_rtx = expand_expr (from, NULL_RTX, GET_MODE (to_rtx), EXPAND_NORMAL);
+  for (int i = 0; i < len; i++)
+    {
+      rtx temp = gen_reg_rtx (sub_mode);
+      rtx src = adjust_address (from_rtx, sub_mode, sub_size * i);
+      rtx dest = adjust_address (to_rtx, sub_mode, sub_size * i);
+      emit_move_insn (temp, src);
+      emit_move_insn (dest, temp);
+    }
+
+  preserve_temp_slots (to_rtx);
+  pop_temp_slots ();
+  return;
+}
+
 /* Expand an assignment that stores the value of FROM into TO.  If NONTEMPORAL
    is true, try generating a nontemporal store.  */
 
@@ -6045,6 +6094,38 @@ expand_assignment (tree to, tree from, bool nontemporal)
       return;
     }
 
+  /* If it is assigning from a struct param which may be passed via registers,
+     It would be better to use the register's mode to move sub-blocks for the
+     assignment.  */
+  if (TREE_CODE (from) == PARM_DECL && mode == BLKmode
+      && DECL_STACK_REGS_P (from))
+    {
+      rtx parm = DECL_INCOMING_RTL (from);
+      gcc_assert (REG_P (parm) || GET_CODE (parm) == PARALLEL);
+
+      machine_mode sub_mode;
+      if (REG_P (parm))
+	sub_mode = word_mode;
+      else
+	sub_mode = GET_MODE (XEXP (XVECEXP (parm, 0, 0), 0));
+
+      move_sub_blocks (to_rtx, from, sub_mode, nontemporal);
+      return;
+    }
+
+  /* If it is assigning to a struct var which will be returned, and the
+     function is returning via registers, it would be better to use the
+     register's mode to move sub-blocks for the assignment.  */
+  if (VAR_P (to) && DECL_USEDBY_RETURN_P (to) && mode == BLKmode
+      && TREE_CODE (from) != CONSTRUCTOR
+      && GET_CODE (DECL_RTL (DECL_RESULT (current_function_decl))) == PARALLEL)
+    {
+      rtx ret = DECL_RTL (DECL_RESULT (current_function_decl));
+      machine_mode sub_mode = GET_MODE (XEXP (XVECEXP (ret, 0, 0), 0));
+      move_sub_blocks (to_rtx, from, sub_mode, nontemporal);
+      return;
+    }
+
   /* Compute FROM and store the value in the rtx we got.  */
 
   push_temp_slots ();
diff --git a/gcc/function.cc b/gcc/function.cc
index dc333c27e92..a118f98a203 100644
--- a/gcc/function.cc
+++ b/gcc/function.cc
@@ -2991,6 +2991,9 @@ assign_parm_setup_block (struct assign_parm_data_all *all,
 
       mem = validize_mem (copy_rtx (stack_parm));
 
+      if (MEM_P (mem))
+	DECL_STACK_REGS_P (parm) = 1;
+
       /* Handle values in multiple non-contiguous locations.  */
       if (GET_CODE (entry_parm) == PARALLEL && !MEM_P (mem))
 	emit_group_store (mem, entry_parm, data->arg.type, size);
diff --git a/gcc/tree-core.h b/gcc/tree-core.h
index e146b133dbd..1a2d6c4ca62 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-core.h
+++ b/gcc/tree-core.h
@@ -1808,7 +1808,9 @@ struct GTY(()) tree_decl_common {
      In VAR_DECL, PARM_DECL and RESULT_DECL, this is
      DECL_HAS_VALUE_EXPR_P.  */
   unsigned decl_flag_2 : 1;
-  /* In FIELD_DECL, this is DECL_PADDING_P.  */
+  /* In FIELD_DECL, this is DECL_PADDING_P
+     In VAR_DECL, this is DECL_USEDBY_RETURN_P
+     In PARM_DECL, this is DECL_STACK_REGS_P.  */
   unsigned decl_flag_3 : 1;
   /* Logically, these two would go in a theoretical base shared by var and
      parm decl. */
diff --git a/gcc/tree.h b/gcc/tree.h
index 4a19de1c94d..f9c2e8491a0 100644
--- a/gcc/tree.h
+++ b/gcc/tree.h
@@ -3007,6 +3007,15 @@ extern void decl_value_expr_insert (tree, tree);
 #define DECL_PADDING_P(NODE) \
   (FIELD_DECL_CHECK (NODE)->decl_common.decl_flag_3)
 
+/* Used in a VAR_DECL to indicate that it is used by a return stmt.  */
+#define DECL_USEDBY_RETURN_P(NODE) \
+  (VAR_DECL_CHECK (NODE)->decl_common.decl_flag_3)
+
+/* Used in a PARM_DECL to indicate that it is struct parameter passed
+   by registers totally and stored to stack during setup.  */
+#define DECL_STACK_REGS_P(NODE) \
+  (PARM_DECL_CHECK (NODE)->decl_common.decl_flag_3)
+
 /* Used in a FIELD_DECL to indicate whether this field is not a flexible
    array member. This is only valid for the last array type field of a
    structure.  */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr65421-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr65421-1.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..ceae0119c19
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr65421-1.c
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+/* PR target/65421 */
+/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target has_arch_ppc64 } */
+
+typedef struct SA
+{
+  double a[2];
+  long l;
+} A;
+
+/* std 3 param regs to return slot */
+A ret_arg (A a) {return a;}
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mstd 4,0\(3\)\s} 1 } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mstd 5,8\(3\)\s} 1 } } *
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mstd 6,16\(3\)\s} 1 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr65421.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr65421.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..db7c465b5a4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr65421.c
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+/* PR target/65421 */
+/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target powerpc_elfv2 } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target has_arch_ppc64 } */
+
+typedef struct SA
+{
+  double a[3];
+} A;
+
+/* 3 lfd */
+A ret_arg_pt (A *a){return *a;}
+
+/* blr */
+A ret_arg (A a) {return a;}
+
+/* 3 stfd */
+void st_arg (A a, A *p) {*p = a;}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mlfd\M} 3 } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mstfd\M} 3 } } */
+
+/* count insns */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {(?n)^\s+[a-z]} 9 } } */
-- 
2.17.1


             reply	other threads:[~2022-12-07 12:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-07 12:00 Jiufu Guo [this message]
2022-12-07 15:23 ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-12-08 13:17   ` Jiufu Guo
2022-12-08 14:58     ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-12-09  3:46       ` Jiufu Guo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221207120008.126895-1-guojiufu@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=guojiufu@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=dje.gcc@gmail.com \
    --cc=ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jeffreyalaw@gmail.com \
    --cc=linkw@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=rguenther@suse.de \
    --cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=steven@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).