From: Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: jason@redhat.com, Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] c++: mark_single_function and SFINAE [PR108282]
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2023 11:37:58 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230104163758.2933306-1-ppalka@redhat.com> (raw)
We typically ignore mark_used failure when in a non-SFINAE context for
sake of better error recovery. But in mark_single_function we're
instead ignoring mark_used failure in a SFINAE context, which ends up
causing the second static_assert here to incorrectly fail.
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for
trunk/12?
PR c++/108282
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* decl2.cc (mark_single_function): Ignore mark_used failure
only in a non-SFINAE context rather than in a SFINAE one.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-requires34.C: New test.
---
gcc/cp/decl2.cc | 2 +-
.../g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-requires34.C | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-requires34.C
diff --git a/gcc/cp/decl2.cc b/gcc/cp/decl2.cc
index f95529a5c9a..00ed64d1691 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/decl2.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/decl2.cc
@@ -5600,7 +5600,7 @@ mark_single_function (tree expr, tsubst_flags_t complain)
if (is_overloaded_fn (expr) == 1
&& !mark_used (expr, complain)
- && (complain & tf_error))
+ && !(complain & tf_error))
return false;
return true;
}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-requires34.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-requires34.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..670a6dab31a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-requires34.C
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+// PR c++/108282
+// { dg-do compile { target c++20 } }
+
+template<class T>
+concept TEST = requires { T::TT; };
+
+struct C { };
+
+template<class AT>
+struct B {
+ static inline void TT() requires TEST<AT>;
+};
+
+int main() {
+ static_assert( !TEST<C> );
+ static_assert( !TEST<B<C>> );
+
+ B<C>::TT(); // { dg-error "no match" }
+}
--
2.39.0.158.g2b4f5a4e4b
next reply other threads:[~2023-01-04 16:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-04 16:37 Patrick Palka [this message]
2023-01-04 19:05 ` Jason Merrill
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230104163758.2933306-1-ppalka@redhat.com \
--to=ppalka@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jason@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).