From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.axis.com (smtp1.axis.com [195.60.68.17]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62E7B3858D32 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2023 01:24:25 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 62E7B3858D32 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=axis.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=axis.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=axis.com; q=dns/txt; s=axis-central1; t=1677547465; x=1709083465; h=from:to:subject:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding: message-id:date; bh=wx1CCBPsm0yRInziG9PDNfKoTd7QjJaUho3RCrcneNc=; b=ZuYAgwJpLIDgBVpBovXLnIVCbqRf3tZ4qh9RLOowYFRGJxqyZhaP6Pcs 1yli/hrIUAWT1EqRJkuasMQuYQlfM66CBPaRdeXU4mGMJX7etz4/zzuao C6aPrVRtS5WuZKPzFfITCO9FoAxWwbbUTG35wSINrPYZVH4HdDUNegFib rW8DxGKuQ8g+qpk5HkoaOt2G3HqiI/uk12yhAOEPMQ5S+VfcDe+9xfEQC yl+d2Yyq6Y+OlM/UiJ2SSs43xcorwuiSpy01jKI5rrspOHaUwtINdYtUQ d5ix4H33qEfLrA5jlXpUrCwNDi2BEXdd9WWduKI6ZAbDUGkwxSRyq1+Ww w==; From: Hans-Peter Nilsson To: Subject: [COMMITTED] testsuite: Remove xfail gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr91091-2.c RHS ! natural_alignment_32 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Message-ID: <20230228012423.D1B7420433@pchp3.se.axis.com> Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2023 02:24:23 +0100 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,GIT_PATCH_0,KAM_NUMSUBJECT,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Committed as obvious. -- >8 -- Reacting to a long-standing XPASS for CRIS. This one is slightly brown paper-bag level; it was never the here-removed xfailed scan that failed and I didn't notice that XPASS when reporting success on the commit as a whole. It's not logical to re-read what was just-written even with overlap issues, and I'm sure that edit was originally a copy-pasto. I checked historical m68k-linux and pru-elf test-results too, to verify that I got that part right. PR testsuite/91419 * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr91091-2.c:15 Remove xfail for RHS. --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr91091-2.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr91091-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr91091-2.c index ecc50d355a7c..792541504903 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr91091-2.c +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr91091-2.c @@ -12,4 +12,4 @@ void swap(struct s* p, struct t* q) /* The second statement is redundant. */ /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "x = " 1 "fre1" { xfail { ! natural_alignment_32 } } } } */ -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " = \[^;\]*x;" 1 "fre1" { xfail { ! natural_alignment_32 } } } } */ +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " = \[^;\]*x;" 1 "fre1" } } */ -- 2.30.2