From: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com>
To: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@axis.com>
Cc: rep.dot.nop@gmail.com, <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>, <dmalcolm@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] testsuite: Fix analyzer errors for newlib-errno
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2023 01:37:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230302013712.59a001bd@nbbrfq> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230301235433.EE3D220426@pchp3.se.axis.com>
On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 00:54:33 +0100
Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@axis.com> wrote:
> > Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2023 00:23:36 +0100
> > From: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com>
>
> > On Wed, 1 Mar 2023 17:02:31 +0100
> > Hans-Peter Nilsson via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> >
> > > > From: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@axis.com>
> > > > Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2023 16:36:46 +0100
> > >
> > > > ... this is what I intend to commit later
> > > > today, just keeping the added comment as brief as
> > > > reasonable:
> > >
> > > Except I see the hook for errno magic took care of
> > > gcc.dg/analyzer/flex-without-call-summaries.c so I'll add
> > > that to the list of handled "FAIL"s in the commit log. Yay.
> >
> > But in the end it means we'll have to keep _[_]+errno{,_location} 'til
> > we bump requirements or 10, 20 years or the end of the universe,
> > doesn't it.
> > Way fancy.
>
> Not sure I see your point? The (other) identifiers are already there.
I'm certainly not opposed to this partiular identifier, no.
>
> (And you do realize that this is in the analyzer part of gcc, right?)
And yes, i'm well aware this is "just" the analyzer -- which is unfair
to state like that and does not mean to imply any inferiority --
particular in this spot.
Just let's ditch any specialcased identifier which was superseded
reliably ASAP?
thanks,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-02 0:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-28 18:47 Hans-Peter Nilsson
2023-02-28 19:12 ` David Malcolm
2023-03-01 0:59 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2023-03-01 2:25 ` David Malcolm
2023-03-01 3:01 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2023-03-01 13:32 ` David Malcolm
2023-03-01 15:36 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2023-03-01 16:02 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2023-03-01 23:23 ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2023-03-01 23:54 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2023-03-02 0:37 ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer [this message]
2023-03-02 0:58 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230302013712.59a001bd@nbbrfq \
--to=rep.dot.nop@gmail.com \
--cc=dmalcolm@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=hp@axis.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).