public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] tree-optimization/109524 - ICE with VRP edge removal
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2023 08:41:38 +0000 (UTC)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230417084138.9y4gBof5GcolGjopnjz0-UIpRWcx8g8Ab_27JLteR9I@z> (raw)

VRP queues edges to process late for updating global ranges for
__builtin_unreachable.  But this interferes with edge removal
from substitute_and_fold.  The following deals with this by
looking up the edge with source/dest block indices which do not
become stale.

For GCC 14 we probably want to refactor substitute_and_fold but
that doesn't seem appropriate at this stage.

Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, OK?

Thanks,
Richard.

	PR tree-optimization/109524
	* tree-vrp.cc (remove_unreachable::m_list): Change to a
	vector of pairs of block indices.
	(remove_unreachable::maybe_register_block): Adjust.
	(remove_unreachable::remove_and_update_globals): Likewise.
	Deal with removed blocks.

	* g++.dg/pr109524.C: New testcase.
---
 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr109524.C | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 gcc/tree-vrp.cc                 | 13 +++++++----
 2 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr109524.C

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr109524.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr109524.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..a560839cd5b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr109524.C
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+// { dg-do compile }
+// { dg-require-effective-target c++11 }
+// { dg-options "-O3 -fno-tree-forwprop -fnon-call-exceptions -fno-tree-ccp -fno-tree-fre" }
+
+struct nn;
+void f();
+int *m;
+struct _Guard {
+        ~_Guard() {
+          if (_M_guarded)
+                  __builtin_unreachable();
+        }
+        nn *_M_guarded;
+};
+struct nn {
+  int * _M_dataplus;
+  nn(nn &)
+        {
+                f();
+                _Guard   __guard;
+                m = _M_dataplus;
+        }
+  nn(){}
+};
+  void hnn(nn *a)
+        {
+                f();
+                _Guard   __guard;
+                m = a->_M_dataplus;
+        }
+bool gg();
+static inline nn
+hh(nn str) {
+  if (gg())
+    return str;
+  __builtin_unreachable();
+}
+void h() {
+
+  hh({});
+}
diff --git a/gcc/tree-vrp.cc b/gcc/tree-vrp.cc
index be7d06f565c..f4d484526c7 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-vrp.cc
+++ b/gcc/tree-vrp.cc
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ public:
   ~remove_unreachable () { m_list.release (); }
   void maybe_register_block (basic_block bb);
   bool remove_and_update_globals (bool final_p);
-  vec<edge> m_list;
+  vec<std::pair<int, int> > m_list;
   gimple_ranger &m_ranger;
 };
 
@@ -103,9 +103,9 @@ remove_unreachable::maybe_register_block (basic_block bb)
     return;
 
   if (un0)
-    m_list.safe_push (e1);
+    m_list.safe_push (std::make_pair (e1->src->index, e1->dest->index));
   else
-    m_list.safe_push (e0);
+    m_list.safe_push (std::make_pair (e0->src->index, e0->dest->index));
 }
 
 // Process the edges in the list, change the conditions and removing any
@@ -132,7 +132,12 @@ remove_unreachable::remove_and_update_globals (bool final_p)
   auto_bitmap all_exports;
   for (i = 0; i < m_list.length (); i++)
     {
-      edge e = m_list[i];
+      auto eb = m_list[i];
+      basic_block src = BASIC_BLOCK_FOR_FN (cfun, eb.first);
+      basic_block dest = BASIC_BLOCK_FOR_FN (cfun, eb.second);
+      if (!src || !dest)
+	continue;
+      edge e = find_edge (src, dest);
       gimple *s = gimple_outgoing_range_stmt_p (e->src);
       gcc_checking_assert (gimple_code (s) == GIMPLE_COND);
       bool lhs_p = TREE_CODE (gimple_cond_lhs (s)) == SSA_NAME;
-- 
2.35.3

             reply	other threads:[~2023-04-17  8:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-17  8:41 Richard Biener [this message]
     [not found] <39683.123041704413900324@us-mta-593.us.mimecast.lan>
2023-04-17  8:47 ` Jakub Jelinek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230417084138.9y4gBof5GcolGjopnjz0-UIpRWcx8g8Ab_27JLteR9I@z \
    --to=rguenther@suse.de \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jakub@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).