From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 524333858C83 for ; Sun, 23 Apr 2023 20:24:54 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 524333858C83 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.crashing.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kernel.crashing.org Received: from gate.crashing.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id 33NKNrEl023711; Sun, 23 Apr 2023 15:23:53 -0500 Received: (from segher@localhost) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id 33NKNrQR023710; Sun, 23 Apr 2023 15:23:53 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: gate.crashing.org: segher set sender to segher@kernel.crashing.org using -f Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2023 15:23:53 -0500 From: Segher Boessenkool To: Jeff Law Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Turn on LRA on all targets Message-ID: <20230423202353.GK19790@gate.crashing.org> References: <283c45ca085ced958cbce6e64331252c83a5899f.1682268126.git.segher@kernel.crashing.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: (You didn't leave me in Cc: on the reply. Maybe you did a reply-to-only-one-person?) On Sun, Apr 23, 2023 at 11:01:05AM -0600, Jeff Law via Gcc-patches wrote: > On 4/23/23 10:47, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > >3) Targets that as of yet never used LRA. Many of those will be fine, > >but some others will need a little tuning, and a few might need some > >actual improvements to LRA itself. These are cris, epiphany, fr30, > >frv, h8300, ia64, iq2000, lm32, m32c, m32r, m68k, mcore, microblaze, > >mmix, mn10300, msp430, nvptx, pa, rl78, stormy16, and visium. We'll > >find out how many of those targets are ever tested, and how many of > >those work with LRA without further changes, and how well. > These test daily except for m68k and pa which test weekly ;-) Ah, very good! But still none of them are tested with LRA at all, after so many years :-( Segher