From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ciao.gmane.io (ciao.gmane.io [116.202.254.214]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D8CE3858C62 for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2023 12:26:52 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 8D8CE3858C62 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmx.de Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=m.gmane-mx.org Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1q7Ej5-0000z6-A3 for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Thu, 08 Jun 2023 14:26:51 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org From: Harald Anlauf Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fortran: add IEEE_QUIET_* and IEEE_SIGNALING_* comparisons Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2023 14:26:42 +0200 Message-ID: <8d3773e6-58a4-ec38-cfd1-f4fb7666e7e3@gmx.de> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.0 Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Cc: fortran@gcc.gnu.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,KAM_SHORT,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Message-ID: <20230608122642.xXennAi2ygGXE6b8dqRwGdikC_ZA_sMAN9WECGDWHXE@z> Hi FX, Am 06.06.23 um 21:29 schrieb FX Coudert via Gcc-patches: > Hi, > > This is a repost of the patch at https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-September/600887.html > which never really got green light, but I stopped pushing because stage 1 was closing and I was out of time. I just looked at that thread. I guess if you answer Mikael's questions at https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-September/601744.html the patch will be fine. > It depends on a middle-end patch adding a type-generic __builtin_iseqsig(), which I posted for review at: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-June/620801.html > > Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, OK to commit (once the middle-end patch is accepted)? > > FX > Thanks, Harald