From: Thiago Jung Bauermann <thiago.bauermann@linaro.org>
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: Thiago Jung Bauermann <thiago.bauermann@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH] [contrib] validate_failures.py: Don't consider summary line in wrong place
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2023 14:02:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230616120214.114098-1-thiago.bauermann@linaro.org> (raw)
When parsing a summary or manifest file, if we're not either after a tool
line (e.g. "=== gdb tests ===") or before a summary line (e.g.,
"=== gdb Summary ===") then the current line can't be a valid result line
so ignore it.
This addresses a problem we're seeing when running the GDB testsuite in
our CI environment where it produces a valid summary file, but then after
the "=== gdb Summary ===" section it outputs a series of Tcl errors that
match _VALID_TEST_RESULTS_REX and thus confuse the parsing logic:
05: 14:32 .sum file seems to be broken: tool="None", exp="None", summary_line="ERROR: -------------------------------------------"
05: 14:32 Traceback (most recent call last):
05: 14:32 File "/path/to/gcc/contrib/testsuite-management/validate_failures.py", line 706, in <module>
05: 14:32 retval = Main(sys.argv)
05: 14:32 File "/path/to/gcc/contrib/testsuite-management/validate_failures.py", line 697, in Main
05: 14:32 retval = CheckExpectedResults()
05: 14:32 File "/path/to/gcc/contrib/testsuite-management/validate_failures.py", line 572, in CheckExpectedResults
05: 14:32 actual = GetResults(sum_files)
05: 14:32 File "/path/to/gcc/contrib/testsuite-management/validate_failures.py", line 447, in GetResults
05: 14:32 build_results.update(ParseSummary(sum_fname))
05: 14:32 File "/path/to/gcc/contrib/testsuite-management/validate_failures.py", line 389, in ParseSummary
05: 14:32 result = result_set.MakeTestResult(line, ordinal)
05: 14:32 File "/path/to/gcc/contrib/testsuite-management/validate_failures.py", line 236, in MakeTestResult
05: 14:32 return TestResult(summary_line, ordinal,
05: 14:32 File "/path/to/gcc/contrib/testsuite-management/validate_failures.py", line 148, in __init__
05: 14:32 raise
contrib/ChangeLog:
* testsuite-management/validate_failures.py (IsInterestingResult):
Add result_set argument and use it. Adjust callers.
---
.../testsuite-management/validate_failures.py | 18 ++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/contrib/testsuite-management/validate_failures.py b/contrib/testsuite-management/validate_failures.py
index 4dfd9cda4e24..11bb6f7e9c7c 100755
--- a/contrib/testsuite-management/validate_failures.py
+++ b/contrib/testsuite-management/validate_failures.py
@@ -295,10 +295,20 @@ def SplitAttributesFromSummaryLine(line):
return (attrs, line)
-def IsInterestingResult(line):
+def IsInterestingResult(result_set, line):
"""Return True if line is one of the summary lines we care about."""
(_, line) = SplitAttributesFromSummaryLine(line)
- return bool(_VALID_TEST_RESULTS_REX.match(line))
+ valid_result = bool(_VALID_TEST_RESULTS_REX.match(line))
+
+ # If there's no tool defined it means that either the results section hasn't
+ # started yet, or it is already over.
+ if valid_result and result_set.current_tool is None:
+ if _OPTIONS.verbosity >= 3:
+ print(f'WARNING: Result "{line}" found outside sum file boundaries.',
+ file=sys.stderr)
+ return False
+
+ return valid_result
def IsToolLine(line):
@@ -354,7 +364,7 @@ def ParseManifestWorker(result_set, manifest_path):
result_set.remove(result_set.MakeTestResult(GetNegativeResult(line)))
elif IsInclude(line):
ParseManifestWorker(result_set, GetIncludeFile(line, manifest_path))
- elif IsInterestingResult(line):
+ elif IsInterestingResult(result_set, line):
result = result_set.MakeTestResult(line)
if result.HasExpired():
# Ignore expired manifest entries.
@@ -391,7 +401,7 @@ def ParseSummary(sum_fname):
ordinal=0
sum_file = open(sum_fname, encoding='latin-1', mode='r')
for line in sum_file:
- if IsInterestingResult(line):
+ if IsInterestingResult(result_set, line):
result = result_set.MakeTestResult(line, ordinal)
ordinal += 1
if result.HasExpired():
next reply other threads:[~2023-06-16 12:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-16 12:02 Thiago Jung Bauermann [this message]
2023-06-17 22:03 ` Jeff Law
2023-06-19 10:04 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230616120214.114098-1-thiago.bauermann@linaro.org \
--to=thiago.bauermann@linaro.org \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).