[PATCH] RISC-V: Fix fails of testcases

public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed

* [PATCH] RISC-V: Fix fails of testcases
@ 2023-06-19 23:04 Juzhe-Zhong
  2023-06-19 23:13 ` Jeff Law
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Juzhe-Zhong @ 2023-06-19 23:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-patches; +Cc: kito.cheng, palmer, rdapp.gcc, jeffreyalaw, Juzhe-Zhong

FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls-vlmax/vec_extract-run.c -std=c99 -O3 -ftree-vectorize --param riscv-autovec-preference=fixed-vlmax (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
xgcc: fatal error: Cannot find suitable multilib set for '-march=rv64imafdcv_zicsr_zifencei_zve32f_zve32x_zve64d_zve64f_zve64x_zvl128b_zvl32b_zvl64b'/'-mabi=lp64d'
compilation terminated.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

        * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls-vlmax/vec_extract-run.c: Fix fail.
        * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls-vlmax/vec_extract-zvfh-run.c: Ditto.
        * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls-vlmax/vec_set-run.c: Ditto.
        * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls-vlmax/vec_set-zvfh-run.c: Ditto.

---
 .../gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls-vlmax/vec_extract-run.c    | 2 +-
 .../riscv/rvv/autovec/vls-vlmax/vec_extract-zvfh-run.c          | 2 +-
 .../gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls-vlmax/vec_set-run.c        | 2 +-
 .../gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls-vlmax/vec_set-zvfh-run.c   | 2 +-
 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls-vlmax/vec_extract-run.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls-vlmax/vec_extract-run.c
index 82bf6d674ec..dd22dae5eb9 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls-vlmax/vec_extract-run.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls-vlmax/vec_extract-run.c
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 /* { dg-do run { target { riscv_vector } } } */
-/* { dg-additional-options "-std=c99 -march=rv64gcv -Wno-pedantic" } */
+/* { dg-additional-options "-std=c99 -Wno-pedantic" } */
 
 #include <assert.h>
 
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls-vlmax/vec_extract-zvfh-run.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls-vlmax/vec_extract-zvfh-run.c
index a0b2cf97afe..db54acc6535 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls-vlmax/vec_extract-zvfh-run.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls-vlmax/vec_extract-zvfh-run.c
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 /* { dg-do run {target { riscv_zvfh_hw } } } */
-/* { dg-additional-options "-march=rv64gcv_zvfh -Wno-pedantic" } */
+/* { dg-additional-options "-Wno-pedantic" } */
 
 #include <assert.h>
 
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls-vlmax/vec_set-run.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls-vlmax/vec_set-run.c
index 7e5e0e69d51..bf04a3d029e 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls-vlmax/vec_set-run.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls-vlmax/vec_set-run.c
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 /* { dg-do run { target { riscv_vector } } } */
-/* { dg-additional-options "-std=c99 -march=rv64gcv -Wno-pedantic" } */
+/* { dg-additional-options "-std=c99 -Wno-pedantic" } */
 
 #include <assert.h>
 
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls-vlmax/vec_set-zvfh-run.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls-vlmax/vec_set-zvfh-run.c
index bf514f9426b..df8363e0428 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls-vlmax/vec_set-zvfh-run.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls-vlmax/vec_set-zvfh-run.c
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 /* { dg-do run { target { riscv_zvfh_hw } } } */
-/* { dg-additional-options "-march=rv64gcv_zvfh -Wno-pedantic" } */
+/* { dg-additional-options "-Wno-pedantic" } */
 
 #include <assert.h>
 
-- 
2.36.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Fix fails of testcases
  2023-06-19 23:04 [PATCH] RISC-V: Fix fails of testcases Juzhe-Zhong
@ 2023-06-19 23:13 ` Jeff Law
  2023-06-19 23:15   ` 钟居哲
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Law @ 2023-06-19 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Juzhe-Zhong, gcc-patches; +Cc: kito.cheng, palmer, rdapp.gcc



On 6/19/23 17:04, Juzhe-Zhong wrote:
> FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls-vlmax/vec_extract-run.c -std=c99 -O3 -ftree-vectorize --param riscv-autovec-preference=fixed-vlmax (test for excess errors)
> Excess errors:
> xgcc: fatal error: Cannot find suitable multilib set for '-march=rv64imafdcv_zicsr_zifencei_zve32f_zve32x_zve64d_zve64f_zve64x_zvl128b_zvl32b_zvl64b'/'-mabi=lp64d'
> compilation terminated.
> 
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> 
>          * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls-vlmax/vec_extract-run.c: Fix fail.
>          * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls-vlmax/vec_extract-zvfh-run.c: Ditto.
>          * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls-vlmax/vec_set-run.c: Ditto.
>          * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls-vlmax/vec_set-zvfh-run.c: Ditto.
Presumably the target selector in the dg-do ensures we only build/run 
these on the appropriate targets now and we don't need explicitly -march 
arguments?

Assuming that's correct, this is fine for the trunk.

jeff

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Fix fails of testcases
  2023-06-19 23:13 ` Jeff Law
@ 2023-06-19 23:15   ` 钟居哲
  2023-06-20  1:18     ` Li, Pan2
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: 钟居哲 @ 2023-06-19 23:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jeff Law, gcc-patches; +Cc: kito.cheng, palmer, rdapp.gcc

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1435 bytes --]

>> Presumably the target selector in the dg-do ensures we only build/run
>> these on the appropriate targets now and we don't need explicitly -march
>> arguments?
Yes. 

>> Assuming that's correct, this is fine for the trunk.
Thanks.


juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai
 
From: Jeff Law
Date: 2023-06-20 07:13
To: Juzhe-Zhong; gcc-patches
CC: kito.cheng; palmer; rdapp.gcc
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Fix fails of testcases
 
 
On 6/19/23 17:04, Juzhe-Zhong wrote:
> FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls-vlmax/vec_extract-run.c -std=c99 -O3 -ftree-vectorize --param riscv-autovec-preference=fixed-vlmax (test for excess errors)
> Excess errors:
> xgcc: fatal error: Cannot find suitable multilib set for '-march=rv64imafdcv_zicsr_zifencei_zve32f_zve32x_zve64d_zve64f_zve64x_zvl128b_zvl32b_zvl64b'/'-mabi=lp64d'
> compilation terminated.
> 
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> 
>          * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls-vlmax/vec_extract-run.c: Fix fail.
>          * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls-vlmax/vec_extract-zvfh-run.c: Ditto.
>          * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls-vlmax/vec_set-run.c: Ditto.
>          * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls-vlmax/vec_set-zvfh-run.c: Ditto.
Presumably the target selector in the dg-do ensures we only build/run 
these on the appropriate targets now and we don't need explicitly -march 
arguments?
 
Assuming that's correct, this is fine for the trunk.
 
jeff
 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* RE: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Fix fails of testcases
  2023-06-19 23:15   ` 钟居哲
@ 2023-06-20  1:18     ` Li, Pan2
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Li, Pan2 @ 2023-06-20  1:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 钟居哲, Jeff Law, gcc-patches
  Cc: kito.cheng, palmer, rdapp.gcc

Committed, thanks Jeff.

Pan

-----Original Message-----
From: Gcc-patches <gcc-patches-bounces+pan2.li=intel.com@gcc.gnu.org> On Behalf Of ???
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2023 7:15 AM
To: Jeff Law <jeffreyalaw@gmail.com>; gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc: kito.cheng <kito.cheng@sifive.com>; palmer <palmer@rivosinc.com>; rdapp.gcc <rdapp.gcc@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Fix fails of testcases

>> Presumably the target selector in the dg-do ensures we only build/run
>> these on the appropriate targets now and we don't need explicitly -march
>> arguments?
Yes. 

>> Assuming that's correct, this is fine for the trunk.
Thanks.


juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai
 
From: Jeff Law
Date: 2023-06-20 07:13
To: Juzhe-Zhong; gcc-patches
CC: kito.cheng; palmer; rdapp.gcc
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Fix fails of testcases
 
 
On 6/19/23 17:04, Juzhe-Zhong wrote:
> FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls-vlmax/vec_extract-run.c -std=c99 -O3 -ftree-vectorize --param riscv-autovec-preference=fixed-vlmax (test for excess errors)
> Excess errors:
> xgcc: fatal error: Cannot find suitable multilib set for '-march=rv64imafdcv_zicsr_zifencei_zve32f_zve32x_zve64d_zve64f_zve64x_zvl128b_zvl32b_zvl64b'/'-mabi=lp64d'
> compilation terminated.
> 
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> 
>          * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls-vlmax/vec_extract-run.c: Fix fail.
>          * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls-vlmax/vec_extract-zvfh-run.c: Ditto.
>          * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls-vlmax/vec_set-run.c: Ditto.
>          * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls-vlmax/vec_set-zvfh-run.c: Ditto.
Presumably the target selector in the dg-do ensures we only build/run 
these on the appropriate targets now and we don't need explicitly -march 
arguments?
 
Assuming that's correct, this is fine for the trunk.
 
jeff
 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2023-06-20  1:18 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-06-19 23:04 [PATCH] RISC-V: Fix fails of testcases Juzhe-Zhong
2023-06-19 23:13 ` Jeff Law
2023-06-19 23:15   ` 钟居哲
2023-06-20  1:18     ` Li, Pan2

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).