From: juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: richard.sandiford@arm.com, rguenther@suse.de,
jeffreyalaw@gmail.com, Ju-Zhe Zhong <juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai>
Subject: [PATCH] GIMPLE_FOLD: Fix gimple fold for LEN_MASK_{LOAD,STORE}
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2023 09:49:40 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230626014940.36902-1-juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai> (raw)
From: Ju-Zhe Zhong <juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai>
Hi, previous I made a mistake on GIMPLE_FOLD of LEN_MASK_{LOAD,STORE}.
We should fold LEN_MASK_{LOAD,STORE} (bias+len) == vf (nunits instead of bytesize) && mask = all trues mask
into:
MEM_REF [...].
This patch added testcase to test gimple fold of LEN_MASK_{LOAD,STORE}.
Ok for trunk ?
gcc/ChangeLog:
* gimple-fold.cc (gimple_fold_partial_load_store_mem_ref): Fix LEN_MASK_{LOAD,STORE}.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/partial/gimple_fold-1.c: New test.
---
gcc/gimple-fold.cc | 16 ++++---
.../riscv/rvv/autovec/partial/gimple_fold-1.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/partial/gimple_fold-1.c
diff --git a/gcc/gimple-fold.cc b/gcc/gimple-fold.cc
index 3d46b76edeb..94e79c32218 100644
--- a/gcc/gimple-fold.cc
+++ b/gcc/gimple-fold.cc
@@ -5397,19 +5397,25 @@ gimple_fold_partial_load_store_mem_ref (gcall *call, tree vectype, bool mask_p)
unsigned int nargs = gimple_call_num_args (call);
tree bias = gimple_call_arg (call, nargs - 1);
gcc_assert (TREE_CODE (bias) == INTEGER_CST);
- if (maybe_ne (wi::to_poly_widest (basic_len) - wi::to_widest (bias),
- GET_MODE_SIZE (TYPE_MODE (vectype))))
- return NULL_TREE;
- /* For LEN_MASK_{LOAD,STORE}, we should also check whether
- the mask is all ones mask. */
internal_fn ifn = gimple_call_internal_fn (call);
if (ifn == IFN_LEN_MASK_LOAD || ifn == IFN_LEN_MASK_STORE)
{
+ /* We fold LEN_MASK_{LOAD,STORE} into MEM_REF when (len + bias) == VF
+ and mask = all trues mask. */
+ if (maybe_ne (wi::to_poly_widest (basic_len) + wi::to_widest (bias),
+ GET_MODE_NUNITS (TYPE_MODE (vectype))))
+ return NULL_TREE;
tree mask = gimple_call_arg (call, internal_fn_mask_index (ifn));
if (!integer_all_onesp (mask))
return NULL_TREE;
}
+ else
+ {
+ if (maybe_ne (wi::to_poly_widest (basic_len) - wi::to_widest (bias),
+ GET_MODE_SIZE (TYPE_MODE (vectype))))
+ return NULL_TREE;
+ }
}
unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT align = tree_to_uhwi (alias_align);
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/partial/gimple_fold-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/partial/gimple_fold-1.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..23407a2d3f4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/partial/gimple_fold-1.c
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-march=rv32gcv -mabi=ilp32d --param riscv-autovec-preference=fixed-vlmax --param riscv-autovec-lmul=m8 -O3 -fdump-tree-optimized-details" } */
+
+#include <stdint-gcc.h>
+
+#define SZ 255
+
+#define DEF(TYPE) void fn_##TYPE (TYPE *__restrict a);
+
+#define RUN(TYPE) \
+ TYPE a##TYPE[SZ]; \
+ for (int i = 0; i < SZ; i++) \
+ { \
+ a##TYPE[i] = 127; \
+ } \
+ fn_##TYPE (a##TYPE);
+
+#define RUN_ALL() \
+ RUN (int8_t) \
+ RUN (int16_t) \
+ RUN (int32_t) \
+ RUN (int64_t) \
+ RUN (uint8_t) \
+ RUN (uint16_t) \
+ RUN (uint32_t) \
+ RUN (uint64_t)
+
+DEF (int8_t)
+DEF (int16_t)
+DEF (int32_t)
+DEF (int64_t)
+DEF (uint8_t)
+DEF (uint16_t)
+DEF (uint32_t)
+DEF (uint64_t)
+
+int
+main ()
+{
+ RUN_ALL ()
+}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "\.LEN_MASK_STORE" 6 "optimized" } } */
--
2.36.3
next reply other threads:[~2023-06-26 1:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-26 1:49 juzhe.zhong [this message]
2023-06-26 7:51 ` Richard Biener
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230626014940.36902-1-juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai \
--to=juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jeffreyalaw@gmail.com \
--cc=rguenther@suse.de \
--cc=richard.sandiford@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).