From: liuhongt <hongtao.liu@intel.com>
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: ubizjak@gmail.com, crazylht@gmail.com, hjl.tools@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Make option mvzeroupper independent of optimization level.
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2023 13:53:12 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230627055312.2881827-2-hongtao.liu@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230627055312.2881827-1-hongtao.liu@intel.com>
pass_insert_vzeroupper is under condition
TARGET_AVX && TARGET_VZEROUPPER
&& flag_expensive_optimizations && !optimize_size
But the document of mvzeroupper doesn't mention the insertion
required -O2 and above, it may confuse users when they explicitly
use -Os -mvzeroupper.
------------
mvzeroupper
Target Mask(VZEROUPPER) Save
Generate vzeroupper instruction before a transfer of control flow out of
the function.
------------
The patch moves flag_expensive_optimizations && !optimize_size to
ix86_option_override_internal. It makes -mvzeroupper independent of
optimization level, but still keeps the behavior of architecture
tuning(emit_vzeroupper) unchanged.
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu{-m32,}.
Ok for trunk?
gcc/ChangeLog:
* config/i386/i386-features.cc (pass_insert_vzeroupper:gate):
Move flag_expensive_optimizations && !optimize_size to ..
* config/i386/i386-options.cc (ix86_option_override_internal):
.. this, it makes -mvzeroupper independent of optimization
level, but still keeps the behavior of architecture
tuning(emit_vzeroupper) unchanged.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.target/i386/avx-vzeroupper-29.c: New testcase.
---
gcc/config/i386/i386-features.cc | 3 +--
gcc/config/i386/i386-options.cc | 4 +++-
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/avx-vzeroupper-29.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/avx-vzeroupper-29.c
diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386-features.cc b/gcc/config/i386/i386-features.cc
index 4a3b07ae045..92ae08d442e 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/i386-features.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386-features.cc
@@ -2489,8 +2489,7 @@ public:
/* opt_pass methods: */
bool gate (function *) final override
{
- return TARGET_AVX && TARGET_VZEROUPPER
- && flag_expensive_optimizations && !optimize_size;
+ return TARGET_AVX && TARGET_VZEROUPPER;
}
unsigned int execute (function *) final override
diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386-options.cc b/gcc/config/i386/i386-options.cc
index 2cb0bddcd35..f76e7c5947b 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/i386-options.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386-options.cc
@@ -2727,7 +2727,9 @@ ix86_option_override_internal (bool main_args_p,
sorry ("%<-mcall-ms2sysv-xlogues%> isn%'t currently supported with SEH");
if (!(opts_set->x_target_flags & MASK_VZEROUPPER)
- && TARGET_EMIT_VZEROUPPER)
+ && TARGET_EMIT_VZEROUPPER
+ && flag_expensive_optimizations
+ && !optimize_size)
opts->x_target_flags |= MASK_VZEROUPPER;
if (!(opts_set->x_target_flags & MASK_STV))
opts->x_target_flags |= MASK_STV;
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/avx-vzeroupper-29.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/avx-vzeroupper-29.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..4af637757f7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/avx-vzeroupper-29.c
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O0 -mavx -mtune=generic -mvzeroupper -dp" } */
+
+#include <immintrin.h>
+
+extern __m256 x, y;
+
+void
+foo ()
+{
+ x = y;
+}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "avx_vzeroupper" 1 } } */
--
2.39.1.388.g2fc9e9ca3c
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-27 5:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-27 5:53 [PATCH 1/2] Don't issue vzeroupper for vzeroupper call_insn liuhongt
2023-06-27 5:53 ` liuhongt [this message]
2023-06-27 6:05 ` [PATCH 2/2] Make option mvzeroupper independent of optimization level Uros Bizjak
2023-06-27 6:08 ` Hongtao Liu
2023-06-27 6:11 ` Uros Bizjak
2023-06-27 6:04 ` [PATCH 1/2] Don't issue vzeroupper for vzeroupper call_insn Uros Bizjak
2023-06-27 6:07 ` Hongtao Liu
2023-06-27 6:11 ` Uros Bizjak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230627055312.2881827-2-hongtao.liu@intel.com \
--to=hongtao.liu@intel.com \
--cc=crazylht@gmail.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
--cc=ubizjak@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).