From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ciao.gmane.io (ciao.gmane.io [116.202.254.214]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CAB663857348 for ; Sat, 8 Jul 2023 14:20:56 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org CAB663857348 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmx.de Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=m.gmane-mx.org Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qI8nv-0001kn-Fl for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Jul 2023 16:20:55 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org From: Harald Anlauf Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fortran: fixes for procedures with ALLOCATABLE,INTENT(OUT) arguments [PR92178] Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2023 16:20:50 +0200 Message-ID: <9dfadeb7-dd48-0a94-1330-a43191bc917f@gmx.de> References: <5a5306ae-0db1-c7e2-e744-a3beced17636@orange.fr> <3adc2904-9876-74d6-2b5d-3cc1896866c3@gmx.de> <3e31cc66-b7ae-adb0-f1a8-18b8bcc11c46@orange.fr> <077e5274-b366-8587-1599-a414e1269862@orange.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.12.0 Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <077e5274-b366-8587-1599-a414e1269862@orange.fr> Cc: fortran@gcc.gnu.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,KAM_LINKBAIT3,KAM_SHORT,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Message-ID: <20230708142050.iX7X9b2RmYGLOaqQe4Cu594QV50ykePfSDzDiR7jdfQ@z> Hi Mikael, Am 08.07.23 um 14:07 schrieb Mikael Morin: > here is what I'm finally coming to.  This patch fixes my example, but is > otherwise untested. > The patch has grown enough that I'm tempted to fix my example > separately, in its own commit. alright. I've interpreted this as a green light for v2 of my patch and pushed it as r14-2395-gb1079fc88f082d https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b1079fc88f082d3c5b583c8822c08c5647810259 so that you can build upon it. > Mikael Thanks, Harald