public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: jason@redhat.com, Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] c++: deducing empty type vs non-type argument pack
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2023 11:18:07 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230718151807.665487-1-ppalka@redhat.com> (raw)

Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for
trunk?  Also verified by way of gcc_assert that we never see
TEMPLATE_PARM_INDEX here.

-- >8 --

Within a template parameter list, a non-type template parameter pack is
represented as a PARM_DECL.  But in a couple of spots where we need to
deduce an empty argument pack, we test for TEMPLATE_PARM_INDEX (within a
template parameter list) instead of for PARM_DECL, which means we end up
using TYPE_ARGUMENT_PACK even in the non-type case.  This patch fixes
this (seemingly harmless) bug.

gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

	* pt.cc (type_unification_real): Test for PARM_DECL instead
	of TEMPLATE_PARM_INDEX to distinguish a type vs non-type
	template parameter pack.
	(type_targs_deducible_from): Likewise.
---
 gcc/cp/pt.cc | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/cp/pt.cc b/gcc/cp/pt.cc
index 3987ffc509a..d342ab5929a 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/pt.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/pt.cc
@@ -23345,7 +23345,7 @@ type_unification_real (tree tparms,
 	    {
 	      tree arg;
 
-	      if (TREE_CODE (tparm) == TEMPLATE_PARM_INDEX)
+	      if (TREE_CODE (tparm) == PARM_DECL)
 		{
 		  arg = make_node (NONTYPE_ARGUMENT_PACK);
 		  TREE_CONSTANT (arg) = 1;
@@ -30369,7 +30369,7 @@ type_targs_deducible_from (tree tmpl, tree type)
 	if (template_parameter_pack_p (tparm))
 	  {
 	    tree arg;
-	    if (TREE_CODE (tparm) == TEMPLATE_PARM_INDEX)
+	    if (TREE_CODE (tparm) == PARM_DECL)
 	      {
 		arg = make_node (NONTYPE_ARGUMENT_PACK);
 		TREE_CONSTANT (arg) = 1;
-- 
2.41.0.363.g5e238546dc


             reply	other threads:[~2023-07-18 15:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-18 15:18 Patrick Palka [this message]
2023-07-18 16:26 ` Jason Merrill

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230718151807.665487-1-ppalka@redhat.com \
    --to=ppalka@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jason@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).