[PATCH 2/2] MATCH: Add `a == b | a cmp b` and `a != b & a cmp b` simplifications

[Andrew Pinski <apinski@marvell.com>]

Even though these are done by combine_comparisons, we can add them to match
to allow simplifcations during match rather than just during reassoc/ifcombine.

OK? Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux-gnu with no regressions.

gcc/ChangeLog:

	PR tree-optimization/106164
	* match.pd (`a != b & a <= b`, `a != b & a >= b`,
	`a == b | a < b`, `a == b | a > b`): Handle these cases
	too.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

	PR tree-optimization/106164
	* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/cmpbit-2.c: New test.
---
 gcc/match.pd                             | 32 +++++++++++++++++--
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/cmpbit-2.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/cmpbit-2.c

diff --git a/gcc/match.pd b/gcc/match.pd
index 00af5d99119..cf8057701ea 100644
--- a/gcc/match.pd
+++ b/gcc/match.pd
@@ -2832,7 +2832,21 @@ DEFINE_INT_AND_FLOAT_ROUND_FN (RINT)
      (switch
       (if (code1 == EQ_EXPR && val) @3)
       (if (code1 == EQ_EXPR && !val) { constant_boolean_node (false, type); })
-      (if (code1 == NE_EXPR && !val) @4)))))))
+      (if (code1 == NE_EXPR && !val) @4)
+      (if (code1 == NE_EXPR
+           && code2 == GE_EXPR
+	   && cmp == 0)
+       (gt @0 @1))
+      (if (code1 == NE_EXPR
+           && code2 == LE_EXPR
+	   && cmp == 0)
+       (lt @0 @1))
+     )
+    )
+   )
+  )
+ )
+)
 
 /* Convert (X OP1 CST1) && (X OP2 CST2).
    Convert (X OP1 Y) && (X OP2 Y).  */
@@ -2917,7 +2931,21 @@ DEFINE_INT_AND_FLOAT_ROUND_FN (RINT)
      (switch
       (if (code1 == EQ_EXPR && val) @4)
       (if (code1 == NE_EXPR && val) { constant_boolean_node (true, type); })
-      (if (code1 == NE_EXPR && !val) @3)))))))
+      (if (code1 == NE_EXPR && !val) @3)
+      (if (code1 == EQ_EXPR
+           && code2 == GT_EXPR
+	   && cmp == 0)
+       (ge @0 @1))
+      (if (code1 == EQ_EXPR
+           && code2 == LT_EXPR
+	   && cmp == 0)
+       (le @0 @1))
+     )
+    )
+   )
+  )
+ )
+)
 
 /* Convert (X OP1 CST1) || (X OP2 CST2).
    Convert (X OP1 Y)    || (X OP2 Y).  */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/cmpbit-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/cmpbit-2.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..c4226ef01af
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/cmpbit-2.c
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O1 -fno-tree-reassoc -fdump-tree-optimized-raw" } */
+
+_Bool f(int a, int b)
+{
+  _Bool c = a == b;
+  _Bool d = a > b;
+  return c | d;
+}
+
+_Bool f1(int a, int b)
+{
+  _Bool c = a != b;
+  _Bool d = a >= b;
+  return c & d;
+}
+
+_Bool g(int a, int b)
+{
+  _Bool c = a == b;
+  _Bool d = a < b;
+  return c | d;
+}
+
+_Bool g1(int a, int b)
+{
+  _Bool c = a != b;
+  _Bool d = a <= b;
+  return c & d;
+}
+
+
+/* We should be able to optimize these without reassociation too. */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "bit_and_expr," "optimized" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "bit_ior_expr," "optimized" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "gt_expr," 1 "optimized" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "ge_expr," 1 "optimized" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "lt_expr," 1 "optimized" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "le_expr," 1 "optimized" } } */
-- 
2.31.1