From: Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: jason@redhat.com, Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] c++: recognize in-class var tmpl partial spec [PR71954]
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 12:08:42 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230810160842.1513222-1-ppalka@redhat.com> (raw)
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK
for trunk?
-- >8 --
This makes us recognize variable template partial specializations
defined directly inside the class body. It seems to suffice to call
check_explicit_specialization when we see a static TEMPLATE_ID_EXPR data
member, which sets SET_DECL_TEMPLATE_SPECIALIZATION and which we
otherwise don't call (for out-of-class partial specializations we call
it from from grokvardecl which is used only for out-of-class definitions).
We also need to make finish_member_template_decl return NULL_TREE for
such partial specializations (matching its behavior class template
partial specializations) so that its caller doesn't try to call
finish_member_declaration on it.
PR c++/71954
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* decl.cc (grokdeclarator): Use 'dname' instead of
'unqualified_id' when building the VAR_DECL for a static data
member. Call check_explicit_specialization for a
TEMPLATE_ID_EXPR such member.
* pt.cc (finish_member_template_decl): Return NULL_TREE
instead of 'decl' when DECL_TEMPLATE_SPECIALIZATION is not
set.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/cpp1y/var-templ84.C: New test.
* g++.dg/cpp1y/var-templ84a.C: New test.
---
gcc/cp/decl.cc | 11 ++++++++++-
gcc/cp/pt.cc | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/var-templ84.C | 12 ++++++++++++
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/var-templ84a.C | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/var-templ84.C
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/var-templ84a.C
diff --git a/gcc/cp/decl.cc b/gcc/cp/decl.cc
index 9fe3a0b98fd..2b3fb313166 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/decl.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/decl.cc
@@ -14440,7 +14440,16 @@ grokdeclarator (const cp_declarator *declarator,
/* C++ allows static class members. All other work
for this is done by grokfield. */
decl = build_lang_decl_loc (id_loc, VAR_DECL,
- unqualified_id, type);
+ dname, type);
+ if (unqualified_id
+ && TREE_CODE (unqualified_id) == TEMPLATE_ID_EXPR)
+ {
+ decl = check_explicit_specialization (unqualified_id, decl,
+ template_count,
+ concept_p * 8);
+ if (decl == error_mark_node)
+ return error_mark_node;
+ }
set_linkage_for_static_data_member (decl);
if (concept_p)
error_at (declspecs->locations[ds_concept],
diff --git a/gcc/cp/pt.cc b/gcc/cp/pt.cc
index 2706fa619bf..a4809f034dc 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/pt.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/pt.cc
@@ -314,7 +314,7 @@ finish_member_template_decl (tree decl)
return DECL_TI_TEMPLATE (decl);
}
else
- return decl;
+ return NULL_TREE;
}
else
error_at (DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (decl),
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/var-templ84.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/var-templ84.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..39c2a0dc0cc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/var-templ84.C
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+// PR c++/71954
+// { dg-do compile { target c++14 } }
+
+struct A {
+ template<class T> static const int var = 0;
+ template<class T> static const int var<T*> = 1;
+ template<class T> static const int var<const T*> = 2;
+};
+
+static_assert(A::var<int> == 0, "");
+static_assert(A::var<int*> == 1, "");
+static_assert(A::var<const int*> == 2, "");
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/var-templ84a.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/var-templ84a.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..4aa3a2a7245
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/var-templ84a.C
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+// PR c++/71954
+// A version of var-templ84.C where the partial specializations depend on
+// outer template parameters.
+// { dg-do compile { target c++14 } }
+
+template<class T>
+struct A {
+ template<class U, class V> static const int var = 0;
+ template<class U> static const int var<U*, T> = 1;
+ template<class U> static const int var<const U*, T> = 2;
+};
+
+static_assert(A<int>::var<int, int> == 0, "");
+static_assert(A<int>::var<int*, int> == 1, "");
+static_assert(A<int>::var<const int*, int> == 2, "");
+
+static_assert(A<int>::var<int, char> == 0, "");
+static_assert(A<int>::var<int*, char> == 0, "");
+static_assert(A<int>::var<const int*, char> == 0, "");
--
2.42.0.rc0.25.ga82fb66fed
next reply other threads:[~2023-08-10 16:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-10 16:08 Patrick Palka [this message]
2023-08-10 21:16 ` Jason Merrill
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230810160842.1513222-1-ppalka@redhat.com \
--to=ppalka@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jason@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).