* [PATCH] x86: Update model values for Raptorlake. @ 2023-08-14 4:37 Cui, Lili 2023-08-14 14:19 ` Jonathan Wakely 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Cui, Lili @ 2023-08-14 4:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-patches; +Cc: hongtao.liu Committed as obvious, and backported to GCC13. Lili. Update model values for Raptorlake according to SDM. gcc/ChangeLog * common/config/i386/cpuinfo.h (get_intel_cpu): Add model value 0xba to Raptorlake. --- gcc/common/config/i386/cpuinfo.h | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/gcc/common/config/i386/cpuinfo.h b/gcc/common/config/i386/cpuinfo.h index ae48bc17771..dd7f0f6abfd 100644 --- a/gcc/common/config/i386/cpuinfo.h +++ b/gcc/common/config/i386/cpuinfo.h @@ -537,6 +537,7 @@ get_intel_cpu (struct __processor_model *cpu_model, case 0x9a: /* Alder Lake. */ case 0xb7: + case 0xba: case 0xbf: /* Raptor Lake. */ case 0xaa: -- 2.25.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] x86: Update model values for Raptorlake. 2023-08-14 4:37 [PATCH] x86: Update model values for Raptorlake Cui, Lili @ 2023-08-14 14:19 ` Jonathan Wakely 2023-08-14 14:25 ` Jonathan Wakely 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Jonathan Wakely @ 2023-08-14 14:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Cui, Lili; +Cc: gcc-patches, hongtao.liu On 14/08/23 04:37 +0000, Pan Li via Gcc-patches wrote: >Committed as obvious, and backported to GCC13. Did you try building it on gcc-13? case 0x97: case 0x9a: case 0xbf: /* Alder Lake. */ case 0xb7: case 0xba: case 0xbf: /* Raptor Lake. */ This fails: In file included from /home/test/src/gcc-13/gcc/config/i386/driver-i386.cc:31: /home/test/src/gcc-13/gcc/common/config/i386/cpuinfo.h: In function ‘const char* get_intel_cpu(__processor_model*, __processor_model2*, unsigned int*)’: /home/test/src/gcc-13/gcc/common/config/i386/cpuinfo.h:543:5: error: duplicate case value 543 | case 0xbf: | ^~~~ /home/test/src/gcc-13/gcc/common/config/i386/cpuinfo.h:539:5: note: previously used here 539 | case 0xbf: | ^~~~ Please fix or revert. >Lili. > > >Update model values for Raptorlake according to SDM. > >gcc/ChangeLog > > * common/config/i386/cpuinfo.h (get_intel_cpu): Add model value 0xba > to Raptorlake. >--- > gcc/common/config/i386/cpuinfo.h | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > >diff --git a/gcc/common/config/i386/cpuinfo.h b/gcc/common/config/i386/cpuinfo.h >index ae48bc17771..dd7f0f6abfd 100644 >--- a/gcc/common/config/i386/cpuinfo.h >+++ b/gcc/common/config/i386/cpuinfo.h >@@ -537,6 +537,7 @@ get_intel_cpu (struct __processor_model *cpu_model, > case 0x9a: > /* Alder Lake. */ > case 0xb7: >+ case 0xba: > case 0xbf: > /* Raptor Lake. */ > case 0xaa: ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] x86: Update model values for Raptorlake. 2023-08-14 14:19 ` Jonathan Wakely @ 2023-08-14 14:25 ` Jonathan Wakely 2023-08-15 2:14 ` Cui, Lili 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Jonathan Wakely @ 2023-08-14 14:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Cui, Lili; +Cc: gcc-patches, hongtao.liu On 14/08/23 15:19 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >On 14/08/23 04:37 +0000, Pan Li via Gcc-patches wrote: >>Committed as obvious, and backported to GCC13. > >Did you try building it on gcc-13? > > case 0x97: > case 0x9a: > case 0xbf: > /* Alder Lake. */ > case 0xb7: > case 0xba: > case 0xbf: > /* Raptor Lake. */ > > >This fails: > >In file included from /home/test/src/gcc-13/gcc/config/i386/driver-i386.cc:31: >/home/test/src/gcc-13/gcc/common/config/i386/cpuinfo.h: In function ‘const char* get_intel_cpu(__processor_model*, __processor_model2*, unsigned int*)’: >/home/test/src/gcc-13/gcc/common/config/i386/cpuinfo.h:543:5: error: duplicate case value > 543 | case 0xbf: > | ^~~~ >/home/test/src/gcc-13/gcc/common/config/i386/cpuinfo.h:539:5: note: previously used here > 539 | case 0xbf: > | ^~~~ > >Please fix or revert. The backported patch is not the same as the trunk one, it adds two new cases not one. But one of them is a duplicate of one you already added in January 2022, in 4bd5297f665fd3ba5691297c016809f3501e7fba No matter how obvious a patch is, if it touches code (not just comments or docs) please don't commit without even building it once. Also, backports should typically say something in the git commit message, e.g. using git gcc-backport (or git cherry-pick -x) will automatically add: (cherry picked from commit 003016a40844701c48851020df672b70f3446bdb) to the commit message. >>Lili. >> >> >>Update model values for Raptorlake according to SDM. >> >>gcc/ChangeLog >> >> * common/config/i386/cpuinfo.h (get_intel_cpu): Add model value 0xba >> to Raptorlake. >>--- >>gcc/common/config/i386/cpuinfo.h | 1 + >>1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> >>diff --git a/gcc/common/config/i386/cpuinfo.h b/gcc/common/config/i386/cpuinfo.h >>index ae48bc17771..dd7f0f6abfd 100644 >>--- a/gcc/common/config/i386/cpuinfo.h >>+++ b/gcc/common/config/i386/cpuinfo.h >>@@ -537,6 +537,7 @@ get_intel_cpu (struct __processor_model *cpu_model, >> case 0x9a: >> /* Alder Lake. */ >> case 0xb7: >>+ case 0xba: >> case 0xbf: >> /* Raptor Lake. */ >> case 0xaa: ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH] x86: Update model values for Raptorlake. 2023-08-14 14:25 ` Jonathan Wakely @ 2023-08-15 2:14 ` Cui, Lili 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Cui, Lili @ 2023-08-15 2:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jonathan Wakely; +Cc: gcc-patches, Liu, Hongtao Sorry, I should have built the patch while backporting, and thanks for your report and suggestions. I'll backport another patch to fix the problems after finishing bootstraps, probably in couple hours. Thank you! Lili. > -----Original Message----- > From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com> > Sent: Monday, August 14, 2023 10:26 PM > To: Cui, Lili <lili.cui@intel.com> > Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Liu, Hongtao <hongtao.liu@intel.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Update model values for Raptorlake. > > On 14/08/23 15:19 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > >On 14/08/23 04:37 +0000, Pan Li via Gcc-patches wrote: > >>Committed as obvious, and backported to GCC13. > > > >Did you try building it on gcc-13? > > > > case 0x97: > > case 0x9a: > > case 0xbf: > > /* Alder Lake. */ > > case 0xb7: > > case 0xba: > > case 0xbf: > > /* Raptor Lake. */ > > > > > >This fails: > > > >In file included from /home/test/src/gcc-13/gcc/config/i386/driver- > i386.cc:31: > >/home/test/src/gcc-13/gcc/common/config/i386/cpuinfo.h: In function ‘const > char* get_intel_cpu(__processor_model*, __processor_model2*, unsigned > int*)’: > >/home/test/src/gcc-13/gcc/common/config/i386/cpuinfo.h:543:5: error: > duplicate case value > > 543 | case 0xbf: > > | ^~~~ > >/home/test/src/gcc-13/gcc/common/config/i386/cpuinfo.h:539:5: note: > previously used here > > 539 | case 0xbf: > > | ^~~~ > > > >Please fix or revert. > > > The backported patch is not the same as the trunk one, it adds two new cases > not one. But one of them is a duplicate of one you already added in January > 2022, in 4bd5297f665fd3ba5691297c016809f3501e7fba > > No matter how obvious a patch is, if it touches code (not just comments or > docs) please don't commit without even building it once. > > Also, backports should typically say something in the git commit message, e.g. > using git gcc-backport (or git cherry-pick -x) will automatically add: > > (cherry picked from commit 003016a40844701c48851020df672b70f3446bdb) > > to the commit message. > > > > > > >>Lili. > >> > >> > >>Update model values for Raptorlake according to SDM. > >> > >>gcc/ChangeLog > >> > >> * common/config/i386/cpuinfo.h (get_intel_cpu): Add model value > 0xba > >> to Raptorlake. > >>--- > >>gcc/common/config/i386/cpuinfo.h | 1 + > >>1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > >> > >>diff --git a/gcc/common/config/i386/cpuinfo.h > >>b/gcc/common/config/i386/cpuinfo.h > >>index ae48bc17771..dd7f0f6abfd 100644 > >>--- a/gcc/common/config/i386/cpuinfo.h > >>+++ b/gcc/common/config/i386/cpuinfo.h > >>@@ -537,6 +537,7 @@ get_intel_cpu (struct __processor_model > *cpu_model, > >> case 0x9a: > >> /* Alder Lake. */ > >> case 0xb7: > >>+ case 0xba: > >> case 0xbf: > >> /* Raptor Lake. */ > >> case 0xaa: ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-08-15 2:14 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2023-08-14 4:37 [PATCH] x86: Update model values for Raptorlake Cui, Lili 2023-08-14 14:19 ` Jonathan Wakely 2023-08-14 14:25 ` Jonathan Wakely 2023-08-15 2:14 ` Cui, Lili
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).