From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtpbguseast2.qq.com (smtpbguseast2.qq.com [54.204.34.130]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03C37385B512 for ; Fri, 18 Aug 2023 02:59:17 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 03C37385B512 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=rivai.ai Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rivai.ai X-QQ-mid: bizesmtp63t1692327553tlh2kuw5 Received: from rios-cad121.hadoop.rioslab.org ( [58.60.1.7]) by bizesmtp.qq.com (ESMTP) with id ; Fri, 18 Aug 2023 10:59:11 +0800 (CST) X-QQ-SSF: 01400000000000C0F000000A0000000 X-QQ-FEAT: ILHsT53NKPjDnLXrDKQgQossz8H4EODLeM2GJnO9HwDljVBIDpK+h4zX63aUo x2PCnf+nRxDiLfe+ekO9WfAfP70CbFFWrz4Iv3qtRqf+RM4CPYggonLrsONH8+NMgVOV7Pa gTPXEWULRDjNFNTlQNiCQRiZX2b/UtERYAalB9RQY1mqqI9FIYYencm77jt3zV5GJ/+VKLO O/TSIkKDcobWmiPVgOwcmJFgSwoTLML60rY6xJkH6omxRY+63a14WK4CIwJ/FipXrdAihgs D8EFfIqBfJRVq5O+FVu9h6PqQf4qIy6RsQdDKvVLztsVzMQQaycC7mzBp8EDXBCGK6l/Lqs lDLFlO3d9cFPwy/wrvAJ10WL8fvT7VPaUm4Xr6/3+QDaQu1uR1b7D3KK+01PA== X-QQ-GoodBg: 2 X-BIZMAIL-ID: 10425127443438499720 From: Lehua Ding To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Cc: juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai, kito.cheng@gmail.com, rdapp.gcc@gmail.com, palmer@rivosinc.com, jeffreyalaw@gmail.com Subject: [PATCH] RISC-V: Fix -march error of zhinxmin testcases Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2023 10:59:11 +0800 Message-Id: <20230818025911.1281907-1-lehua.ding@rivai.ai> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.36.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-QQ-SENDSIZE: 520 Feedback-ID: bizesmtp:rivai.ai:qybglogicsvrgz:qybglogicsvrgz6a-0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,GIT_PATCH_0,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,KAM_SHORT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: This little patch fixs the -march error of a zhinxmin testcase I added earlier and an old zhinxmin testcase, since these testcases are for zhinxmin extension and not zfhmin extension. --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/_Float16-zhinxmin-3.c | 2 +- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/_Float16-zhinxmin-4.c | 5 +++-- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/_Float16-zhinxmin-3.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/_Float16-zhinxmin-3.c index 7a43641a5a6..939b3787383 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/_Float16-zhinxmin-3.c +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/_Float16-zhinxmin-3.c @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ /* { dg-do compile } */ -/* { dg-options "-march=rv64if_zfhmin -mabi=lp64f -O" } */ +/* { dg-options "-march=rv64i_zhinxmin -mabi=lp64 -O" } */ int foo1 (_Float16 a, _Float16 b) { diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/_Float16-zhinxmin-4.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/_Float16-zhinxmin-4.c index 4ac49228898..ebc615a483f 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/_Float16-zhinxmin-4.c +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/_Float16-zhinxmin-4.c @@ -1,11 +1,12 @@ /* { dg-do compile } */ -/* { dg-options "-march=rv64if_zfhmin -mabi=lp64 -O3 -mcmodel=medany" } */ +/* { dg-options "-march=rv64i_zhinxmin -mabi=lp64 -O3 -mcmodel=medany" } */ /* { dg-final { check-function-bodies "**" "" } } */ /* Make sure zfhmin behaves the same way as zfh. */ /* ** foo: { target { no-opts "-flto" } } -** lh\ta0,\.LC0 +** lla\ta[0-9]+,\.LC0 +** lhu\ta[0-9]+,0\(a[0-9]+\) ** ... */ _Float16 foo() { return 0.8974; } -- 2.36.3