From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
ksummit@lists.linux.dev, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [MAINTAINERS/KERNEL SUMMIT] Trust and maintenance of file systems
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2023 07:24:22 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230907122422.GI19790@gate.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230907072245.666b2fda@gandalf.local.home>
On Thu, Sep 07, 2023 at 07:22:45AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Sep 2023 06:04:09 -0500
> Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 07, 2023 at 12:48:25PM +0300, Dan Carpenter via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > No. You should patch your program, instead. One easy way is to add a
> > -Wno-error at the end of your command lines. Or even just -w if you
> > want or need a bigger hammer.
>
> That's not really possible when bisecting a kernel bug into older kernels.
> The build system is highly complex and requires hundreds of changes to do
> what you suggested. As it is for a bisection that takes a minimum of 13
> iterations, your approach just isn't feasible.
Isn't this exactly what KCFLAGS is for?
But, I meant to edit the build system. It isn't so hard to bisect with
patch stacks on top. Just a bit annoying.
Segher
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-07 12:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <ZO9NK0FchtYjOuIH@infradead.org>
[not found] ` <8718a8a3-1e62-0e2b-09d0-7bce3155b045@roeck-us.net>
[not found] ` <ZPkDLp0jyteubQhh@dread.disaster.area>
[not found] ` <20230906215327.18a45c89@gandalf.local.home>
2023-09-07 9:48 ` Dan Carpenter
2023-09-07 11:04 ` Segher Boessenkool
2023-09-07 11:22 ` Steven Rostedt
2023-09-07 12:24 ` Segher Boessenkool [this message]
2023-09-07 11:23 ` Dan Carpenter
2023-09-07 12:30 ` Segher Boessenkool
2023-09-12 9:50 ` Richard Biener
2023-10-23 5:19 ` Eric Gallager
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230907122422.GI19790@gate.crashing.org \
--to=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=ksummit@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).