From: "Kewen.Lin" <linkw@linux.ibm.com>
To: Peter Bergner <bergner@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>,
David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com>,
GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rs6000: Replace OPTION_MASK_DIRECT_MOVE with OPTION_MASK_P8_VECTOR [PR101865]
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2024 16:55:29 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20234c37-d03b-a163-9e60-d63b965a55e0@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e7e00587-d92a-451d-a409-ebe96e983ea7@linux.ibm.com>
Hi Peter,
on 2024/4/6 06:28, Peter Bergner wrote:
> This is a cleanup patch in preparation to fixing the real bug in PR101865.
> TARGET_DIRECT_MOVE is redundant with TARGET_P8_VECTOR, so alias it to that.
> Also replace all usages of OPTION_MASK_DIRECT_MOVE with OPTION_MASK_P8_VECTOR
> and delete the now dead mask.
>
> This passed bootstrap and retesting on powerpc64le-linux with no regressions.
> Ok for trunk?
>
> Eventually we'll want to backport this along with the follow-on patch that
> actually fixes PR101865.
>
> Peter
>
>
> gcc/
> PR target/101865
> * config/rs6000/rs6000.h (TARGET_DIRECT_MOVE): Define.
> * config/rs6000/rs6000.cc (rs6000_option_override_internal): Replace
> OPTION_MASK_DIRECT_MOVE with OPTION_MASK_P8_VECTOR. Delete redundant
> OPTION_MASK_DIRECT_MOVE usage. Delete TARGET_DIRECT_MOVE dead code.
> (rs6000_opt_masks): Neuter the "direct-move" option.
> * config/rs6000/rs6000-c.cc (rs6000_target_modify_macros): Replace
> OPTION_MASK_DIRECT_MOVE with OPTION_MASK_P8_VECTOR. Delete useless
> comment.
> * config/rs6000/rs6000-cpus.def (ISA_2_7_MASKS_SERVER): Delete
> OPTION_MASK_DIRECT_MOVE.
> (OTHER_VSX_VECTOR_MASKS): Likewise.
> (POWERPC_MASKS): Likewise.
> * config/rs6000/rs6000.opt (mno-direct-move): New.
> (mdirect-move): Remove Mask and Var.
>
>
> diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.h b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.h
> index 68bc45d65ba..77d045c9f6e 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.h
> +++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.h
> @@ -471,6 +471,8 @@ extern int rs6000_vector_align[];
> #define TARGET_EXTSWSLI (TARGET_MODULO && TARGET_POWERPC64)
> #define TARGET_MADDLD TARGET_MODULO
>
> +/* TARGET_DIRECT_MOVE is redundant to TARGET_P8_VECTOR, so alias it to that. */
> +#define TARGET_DIRECT_MOVE TARGET_P8_VECTOR
> #define TARGET_XSCVDPSPN (TARGET_DIRECT_MOVE || TARGET_P8_VECTOR)
> #define TARGET_XSCVSPDPN (TARGET_DIRECT_MOVE || TARGET_P8_VECTOR)
> #define TARGET_VADDUQM (TARGET_P8_VECTOR && TARGET_POWERPC64)
> diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc
> index 6ba9df4f02e..c241371147c 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc
> +++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc
> @@ -3811,7 +3811,7 @@ rs6000_option_override_internal (bool global_init_p)
> Testing for direct_move matches power8 and later. */
> if (!BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN
> && !(processor_target_table[tune_index].target_enable
> - & OPTION_MASK_DIRECT_MOVE))
> + & OPTION_MASK_P8_VECTOR))
> rs6000_isa_flags |= ~rs6000_isa_flags_explicit & OPTION_MASK_STRICT_ALIGN;
>
> /* Add some warnings for VSX. */
> @@ -3853,8 +3853,7 @@ rs6000_option_override_internal (bool global_init_p)
> && (rs6000_isa_flags_explicit & (OPTION_MASK_SOFT_FLOAT
> | OPTION_MASK_ALTIVEC
> | OPTION_MASK_VSX)) != 0)
> - rs6000_isa_flags &= ~((OPTION_MASK_P8_VECTOR | OPTION_MASK_CRYPTO
> - | OPTION_MASK_DIRECT_MOVE)
> + rs6000_isa_flags &= ~((OPTION_MASK_P8_VECTOR | OPTION_MASK_CRYPTO)
> & ~rs6000_isa_flags_explicit);
>
> if (TARGET_DEBUG_REG || TARGET_DEBUG_TARGET)
> @@ -3939,13 +3938,6 @@ rs6000_option_override_internal (bool global_init_p)
> rs6000_isa_flags &= ~OPTION_MASK_FPRND;
> }
>
> - if (TARGET_DIRECT_MOVE && !TARGET_VSX)
> - {
> - if (rs6000_isa_flags_explicit & OPTION_MASK_DIRECT_MOVE)
> - error ("%qs requires %qs", "-mdirect-move", "-mvsx");
> - rs6000_isa_flags &= ~OPTION_MASK_DIRECT_MOVE;
> - }
> -
> if (TARGET_P8_VECTOR && !TARGET_ALTIVEC)
> rs6000_isa_flags &= ~OPTION_MASK_P8_VECTOR;
>
> @@ -24429,7 +24421,7 @@ static struct rs6000_opt_mask const rs6000_opt_masks[] =
> false, true },
> { "cmpb", OPTION_MASK_CMPB, false, true },
> { "crypto", OPTION_MASK_CRYPTO, false, true },
> - { "direct-move", OPTION_MASK_DIRECT_MOVE, false, true },
> + { "direct-move", 0, false, true },
> { "dlmzb", OPTION_MASK_DLMZB, false, true },
> { "efficient-unaligned-vsx", OPTION_MASK_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_VSX,
> false, true },
> diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-c.cc b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-c.cc
> index ce0b14a8d37..647f20de7f2 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-c.cc
> +++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-c.cc
> @@ -429,19 +429,7 @@ rs6000_target_modify_macros (bool define_p, HOST_WIDE_INT flags)
> rs6000_define_or_undefine_macro (define_p, "_ARCH_PWR6");
> if ((flags & OPTION_MASK_POPCNTD) != 0)
> rs6000_define_or_undefine_macro (define_p, "_ARCH_PWR7");
> - /* Note that the OPTION_MASK_DIRECT_MOVE flag is automatically
> - turned on in the following condition:
> - 1. TARGET_P8_VECTOR is enabled and OPTION_MASK_DIRECT_MOVE is not
> - explicitly disabled.
> - Hereafter, the OPTION_MASK_DIRECT_MOVE flag is considered to
> - have been turned on explicitly.
> - Note that the OPTION_MASK_DIRECT_MOVE flag is automatically
> - turned off in any of the following conditions:
> - 1. TARGET_HARD_FLOAT, TARGET_ALTIVEC, or TARGET_VSX is explicitly
> - disabled and OPTION_MASK_DIRECT_MOVE was not explicitly
> - enabled.
> - 2. TARGET_VSX is off. */
> - if ((flags & OPTION_MASK_DIRECT_MOVE) != 0)
> + if ((flags & OPTION_MASK_P8_VECTOR) != 0)
> rs6000_define_or_undefine_macro (define_p, "_ARCH_PWR8");
> if ((flags & OPTION_MASK_MODULO) != 0)
> rs6000_define_or_undefine_macro (define_p, "_ARCH_PWR9");
> diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-cpus.def b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-cpus.def
> index 28249600318..45dd5a85901 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-cpus.def
> +++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-cpus.def
> @@ -49,7 +49,6 @@
> #define ISA_2_7_MASKS_SERVER (ISA_2_6_MASKS_SERVER \
> | OPTION_MASK_P8_VECTOR \
> | OPTION_MASK_CRYPTO \
> - | OPTION_MASK_DIRECT_MOVE \
> | OPTION_MASK_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_VSX \
> | OPTION_MASK_QUAD_MEMORY \
> | OPTION_MASK_QUAD_MEMORY_ATOMIC)
> @@ -90,7 +89,6 @@
> #define OTHER_VSX_VECTOR_MASKS (OPTION_MASK_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_VSX \
> | OPTION_MASK_FLOAT128_KEYWORD \
> | OPTION_MASK_P8_VECTOR \
> - | OPTION_MASK_DIRECT_MOVE \
> | OPTION_MASK_CRYPTO \
> | OPTION_MASK_P9_VECTOR \
> | OPTION_MASK_FLOAT128_HW \
> @@ -118,7 +116,6 @@
> | OPTION_MASK_CMPB \
> | OPTION_MASK_CRYPTO \
> | OPTION_MASK_DFP \
> - | OPTION_MASK_DIRECT_MOVE \
> | OPTION_MASK_DLMZB \
> | OPTION_MASK_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_VSX \
> | OPTION_MASK_FLOAT128_HW \
> diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.opt b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.opt
> index 83197681b66..62131e45bdf 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.opt
> +++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.opt
> @@ -490,8 +490,11 @@ mcrypto
> Target Mask(CRYPTO) Var(rs6000_isa_flags)
> Use ISA 2.07 Category:Vector.AES and Category:Vector.SHA2 instructions.
>
> +mno-direct-move
> +Target Undocumented WarnRemoved
> +
> mdirect-move
> -Target Undocumented Mask(DIRECT_MOVE) Var(rs6000_isa_flags) WarnRemoved
> +Target Undocumented WarnRemoved
When reviewing my previous patch to "neuter option -mpower{8,9}-vector",
Segher mentioned that we don't need to keep such option warning all the
time and can drop it like in a release later as users should be aware of
this information then, I agreed and considering that patch disabling
-m[no-]direct-move was r8-7845-g57f108f5a1e1b2, I think we can just remove
m[no-]direct-move here? What do you think?
OK for trunk with this tweaked if you agree that, and also ok for active
release branches after burn-in time, thanks!
BR,
Kewen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-08 8:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-05 22:28 Peter Bergner
2024-04-08 8:55 ` Kewen.Lin [this message]
2024-04-08 13:21 ` Peter Bergner
2024-04-09 2:37 ` Kewen.Lin
2024-04-09 3:20 ` Peter Bergner
2024-04-09 5:37 ` Kewen.Lin
2024-04-09 20:19 ` Peter Bergner
2024-04-10 2:52 ` Peter Bergner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20234c37-d03b-a163-9e60-d63b965a55e0@linux.ibm.com \
--to=linkw@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bergner@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=dje.gcc@gmail.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).