From: Andrew Pinski <quic_apinski@quicinc.com>
To: <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc: Andrew Pinski <quic_apinski@quicinc.com>
Subject: [PATCHv2] aarch64/expr: Use ccmp when the outer expression is used twice [PR100942]
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 23:43:30 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240105074330.2309587-1-quic_apinski@quicinc.com> (raw)
Ccmp is not used if the result of the and/ior is used by both
a GIMPLE_COND and a GIMPLE_ASSIGN. This improves the code generation
here by using ccmp in this case.
Two changes is required, first we need to allow the outer statement's
result be used more than once.
The second change is that during the expansion of the gimple, we need
to try using ccmp. This is needed because we don't use expand the ssa
name of the lhs but rather expand directly from the gimple.
A small note on the ccmp_4.c testcase, we should be able to get slightly
better than with this patch but it is one extra instruction compared to
before.
Diff from v1:
* v2: Split out expand_gimple_assign_ssa so the we only need to handle
promotion once. Add ccmp_5.c testcase which was suggested. Change comment
on ccmp_candidate_p.
Bootstraped and tested on aarch64-linux-gnu with no regressions.
PR target/100942
gcc/ChangeLog:
* ccmp.cc (ccmp_candidate_p): Add outer argument.
Allow if the outer is true and the lhs is used more
than once.
(expand_ccmp_expr): Update call to ccmp_candidate_p.
* cfgexpand.cc (expand_gimple_assign_ssa): New function, try
using ccmp for binary assignments and extracted from ...
(expand_gimple_stmt_1): Here. Call expand_gimple_assign_ssa.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.target/aarch64/ccmp_3.c: New test.
* gcc.target/aarch64/ccmp_4.c: New test.
* gcc.target/aarch64/ccmp_5.c: New test.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Pinski <quic_apinski@quicinc.com>
---
gcc/ccmp.cc | 12 ++--
gcc/cfgexpand.cc | 75 +++++++++++++++--------
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/ccmp_3.c | 20 ++++++
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/ccmp_4.c | 35 +++++++++++
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/ccmp_5.c | 20 ++++++
5 files changed, 132 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/ccmp_3.c
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/ccmp_4.c
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/ccmp_5.c
diff --git a/gcc/ccmp.cc b/gcc/ccmp.cc
index 09d6b5595a4..7cb525addf4 100644
--- a/gcc/ccmp.cc
+++ b/gcc/ccmp.cc
@@ -90,9 +90,10 @@ ccmp_tree_comparison_p (tree t, basic_block bb)
If all checks OK in expand_ccmp_expr, it emits insns in prep_seq, then
insns in gen_seq. */
-/* Check whether G is a potential conditional compare candidate. */
+/* Check whether G is a potential conditional compare candidate; OUTER is true if
+ G is the outer most AND/IOR. */
static bool
-ccmp_candidate_p (gimple *g)
+ccmp_candidate_p (gimple *g, bool outer = false)
{
tree lhs, op0, op1;
gimple *gs0, *gs1;
@@ -109,8 +110,9 @@ ccmp_candidate_p (gimple *g)
lhs = gimple_assign_lhs (g);
op0 = gimple_assign_rhs1 (g);
op1 = gimple_assign_rhs2 (g);
- if ((TREE_CODE (op0) != SSA_NAME) || (TREE_CODE (op1) != SSA_NAME)
- || !has_single_use (lhs))
+ if ((TREE_CODE (op0) != SSA_NAME) || (TREE_CODE (op1) != SSA_NAME))
+ return false;
+ if (!outer && !has_single_use (lhs))
return false;
bb = gimple_bb (g);
@@ -284,7 +286,7 @@ expand_ccmp_expr (gimple *g, machine_mode mode)
rtx_insn *last;
rtx tmp;
- if (!ccmp_candidate_p (g))
+ if (!ccmp_candidate_p (g, true))
return NULL_RTX;
last = get_last_insn ();
diff --git a/gcc/cfgexpand.cc b/gcc/cfgexpand.cc
index 1db22f0a1a3..293b9386192 100644
--- a/gcc/cfgexpand.cc
+++ b/gcc/cfgexpand.cc
@@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3. If not see
#include "output.h"
#include "builtins.h"
#include "opts.h"
+#include "ccmp.h"
/* Some systems use __main in a way incompatible with its use in gcc, in these
cases use the macros NAME__MAIN to give a quoted symbol and SYMBOL__MAIN to
@@ -3858,6 +3859,50 @@ expand_clobber (tree lhs)
}
}
+/* A subroutine of expand_gimple_stmt_1, expanding one gimple assign statement
+ ASSIGN_STMT that has a SSA name on the lhs, using TARGET and TARGET_MODE
+ as the target if possible and mode for what mode we should expand into. */
+static rtx
+expand_gimple_assign_ssa (gassign *assign_stmt,
+ rtx target,
+ machine_mode target_mode)
+{
+ rtx temp;
+ tree lhs = gimple_assign_lhs (assign_stmt);
+ /* Try to expand conditonal compare. */
+ if (targetm.gen_ccmp_first
+ && gimple_assign_rhs_class (assign_stmt) == GIMPLE_BINARY_RHS)
+ {
+ machine_mode mode = TYPE_MODE (TREE_TYPE (lhs));
+ gcc_checking_assert (targetm.gen_ccmp_next != NULL);
+ temp = expand_ccmp_expr (assign_stmt, mode);
+ if (temp)
+ return temp;
+ }
+
+ struct separate_ops ops;
+ ops.code = gimple_assign_rhs_code (assign_stmt);
+ ops.type = TREE_TYPE (lhs);
+ switch (get_gimple_rhs_class (ops.code))
+ {
+ case GIMPLE_TERNARY_RHS:
+ ops.op2 = gimple_assign_rhs3 (assign_stmt);
+ /* Fallthru */
+ case GIMPLE_BINARY_RHS:
+ ops.op1 = gimple_assign_rhs2 (assign_stmt);
+ /* Fallthru */
+ case GIMPLE_UNARY_RHS:
+ ops.op0 = gimple_assign_rhs1 (assign_stmt);
+ break;
+ default:
+ gcc_unreachable ();
+ }
+ ops.location = gimple_location (assign_stmt);
+
+ return expand_expr_real_2 (&ops, target, target_mode,
+ EXPAND_NORMAL);
+}
+
/* A subroutine of expand_gimple_stmt, expanding one gimple statement
STMT that doesn't require special handling for outgoing edges. That
is no tailcalls and no GIMPLE_COND. */
@@ -3971,37 +4016,17 @@ expand_gimple_stmt_1 (gimple *stmt)
{
rtx target, temp;
bool nontemporal = gimple_assign_nontemporal_move_p (assign_stmt);
- struct separate_ops ops;
bool promoted = false;
target = expand_expr (lhs, NULL_RTX, VOIDmode, EXPAND_WRITE);
if (GET_CODE (target) == SUBREG && SUBREG_PROMOTED_VAR_P (target))
promoted = true;
- ops.code = gimple_assign_rhs_code (assign_stmt);
- ops.type = TREE_TYPE (lhs);
- switch (get_gimple_rhs_class (ops.code))
- {
- case GIMPLE_TERNARY_RHS:
- ops.op2 = gimple_assign_rhs3 (assign_stmt);
- /* Fallthru */
- case GIMPLE_BINARY_RHS:
- ops.op1 = gimple_assign_rhs2 (assign_stmt);
- /* Fallthru */
- case GIMPLE_UNARY_RHS:
- ops.op0 = gimple_assign_rhs1 (assign_stmt);
- break;
- default:
- gcc_unreachable ();
- }
- ops.location = gimple_location (stmt);
-
- /* If we want to use a nontemporal store, force the value to
- register first. If we store into a promoted register,
- don't directly expand to target. */
+ /* If we want to use a nontemporal store, force the value to
+ register first. If we store into a promoted register,
+ don't directly expand to target. */
temp = nontemporal || promoted ? NULL_RTX : target;
- temp = expand_expr_real_2 (&ops, temp, GET_MODE (target),
- EXPAND_NORMAL);
+ temp = expand_gimple_assign_ssa (assign_stmt, temp, GET_MODE (target));
if (temp == target)
;
@@ -4013,7 +4038,7 @@ expand_gimple_stmt_1 (gimple *stmt)
if (CONSTANT_P (temp) && GET_MODE (temp) == VOIDmode)
{
temp = convert_modes (GET_MODE (target),
- TYPE_MODE (ops.type),
+ TYPE_MODE (TREE_TYPE (lhs)),
temp, unsignedp);
temp = convert_modes (GET_MODE (SUBREG_REG (target)),
GET_MODE (target), temp, unsignedp);
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/ccmp_3.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/ccmp_3.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..a2b47fbee14
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/ccmp_3.c
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
+/* PR target/100942 */
+
+void foo(void);
+int f1(int a, int b)
+{
+ int c = a == 0 || b == 0;
+ if (c) foo();
+ return c;
+}
+
+/* We should get one cmp followed by ccmp and one cset. */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "\tccmp\t" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\tcset\t" 1 } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\tcmp\t" 1 } } */
+/* And not get 2 cmps and 2 (or more cset) and orr and a cbnz. */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "\torr\t" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "\tcbnz\t" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "\tcbz\t" } } */
+
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/ccmp_4.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/ccmp_4.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..bc0f57a7c59
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/ccmp_4.c
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
+/* PR target/100942 */
+
+void foo(void);
+int f1(int a, int b, int d)
+{
+ int c = a < 8 || b < 9;
+ int e = d < 11 || c;
+ if (e) foo();
+ return c;
+}
+
+/*
+ We really should get:
+ cmp w0, 7
+ ccmp w1, 8, 4, gt
+ cset w0, le
+ ccmp w2, 10, 4, gt
+ ble .L11
+
+ But we currently get:
+ cmp w0, 7
+ ccmp w1, 8, 4, gt
+ cset w0, le
+ cmp w0, 0
+ ccmp w2, 10, 4, eq
+ ble .L11
+ The middle cmp is not needed.
+ */
+
+/* We should end up with only one cmp and 2 ccmp and 1 cset but currently we get 2 cmp
+ though. */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\tccmp\t" 2 } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\tcset\t" 1 } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\tcmp\t" 1 { xfail *-*-* } } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/ccmp_5.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/ccmp_5.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..7e52ae4f322
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/ccmp_5.c
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+
+/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
+/* PR target/100942 */
+void f1(int a, int b, _Bool *x)
+{
+ x[0] = x[1] = a == 0 || b == 0;
+}
+
+void f2(int a, int b, int *x)
+{
+ x[0] = x[1] = a == 0 || b == 0;
+}
+
+
+/* Both functions should be using ccmp rather than 2 cset/orr. */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\tccmp\t" 2 } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\tcset\t" 2 } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\tcmp\t" 2 } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "\torr\t" } } */
+
--
2.39.3
next reply other threads:[~2024-01-05 7:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-05 7:43 Andrew Pinski [this message]
2024-01-12 12:26 ` [PATCHv3] " Richard Sandiford
2024-01-12 21:28 ` Andrew Pinski (QUIC)
2024-01-22 13:24 ` Ping: " Richard Sandiford
2024-01-22 14:06 ` Richard Biener
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240105074330.2309587-1-quic_apinski@quicinc.com \
--to=quic_apinski@quicinc.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).