public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com>
To: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
	libstdc++ <libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org>,
	Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>,
	Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] libstdc++: suppress -Wdangling-reference with operator| [PR111410]
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2024 21:17:51 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240120021751.81798-1-polacek@redhat.com> (raw)

Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk?

-- >8 --
It seems to me that we should exclude std::ranges::views::__adaptor::operator|
from the -Wdangling-reference warning.  It's commonly used when handling
ranges.

	PR c++/111410

libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:

	* include/std/ranges: Add #pragma to disable -Wdangling-reference with
	std::ranges::views::__adaptor::operator|.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

	* g++.dg/warn/Wdangling-reference17.C: New test.
---
 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wdangling-reference17.C | 15 +++++++++++++++
 libstdc++-v3/include/std/ranges                   |  3 +++
 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wdangling-reference17.C

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wdangling-reference17.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wdangling-reference17.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..223698422c2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wdangling-reference17.C
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+// PR c++/111410
+// { dg-do compile { target c++20 } }
+// { dg-options "-Wdangling-reference" }
+
+#include <vector>
+#include <ranges>
+
+int main()
+{
+  std::vector v{1, 2, 3, 4, 5};
+  for (auto i : std::span{v} | std::views::take(1))
+    {
+      (void) i;
+    }
+}
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/ranges b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/ranges
index 7ef835f486a..f2413badd9c 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/ranges
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/ranges
@@ -942,6 +942,8 @@ namespace views::__adaptor
     concept __is_range_adaptor_closure
       = requires (_Tp __t) { __adaptor::__is_range_adaptor_closure_fn(__t, __t); };
 
+#pragma GCC diagnostic push
+#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wdangling-reference"
   // range | adaptor is equivalent to adaptor(range).
   template<typename _Self, typename _Range>
     requires __is_range_adaptor_closure<_Self>
@@ -961,6 +963,7 @@ namespace views::__adaptor
       return _Pipe<decay_t<_Lhs>, decay_t<_Rhs>>{std::forward<_Lhs>(__lhs),
 						 std::forward<_Rhs>(__rhs)};
     }
+#pragma GCC diagnostic pop
 
   // The base class of every range adaptor non-closure.
   //

base-commit: 615e25c82de97acc17ab438f88d6788cf7ffe1d6
-- 
2.43.0


             reply	other threads:[~2024-01-20  2:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-20  2:17 Marek Polacek [this message]
2024-01-20  7:46 ` Jonathan Wakely

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240120021751.81798-1-polacek@redhat.com \
    --to=polacek@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jason@redhat.com \
    --cc=jwakely@redhat.com \
    --cc=libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).