From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98D233858C60 for ; Thu, 8 Feb 2024 18:43:13 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 98D233858C60 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.crashing.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kernel.crashing.org ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 98D233858C60 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=63.228.1.57 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1707417795; cv=none; b=bZX4ZVb/ZINsC5ZJ850a1IGs/ZsBzYu8ZidLHNGAHRq+ltpqrebaj7KgXhtojacyFiOvS2e6hvtaw+BPQjn8+VEq1ndwoLZ+z7bnRQQkdA6oPY2WOpyd43XpNlKqXm6Kmsla8QvD92XM/T68fUzQz/g1DWadEa/6minuVW3bV/s= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1707417795; c=relaxed/simple; bh=DEsJPUclgDmJSoaRpFvgBBAb/+9GTWAFxR4+ckew104=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Mime-Version; b=r8XGYDPYA89CGbTWZGVE1Lm2t5/3hvcpqcKu/FNJLlhSKcQ5tMRm61UlLDzXjNwPHfrXgP9CYqmBWgAfeN5K9YgngLn4lIOnlfu/GkceWSRk6U1TxlyY6CjGTomQxba6uMAxrW7NM9QqttZc4WM/NsZKKXJ9gJqNEP100LsTKls= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org Received: from gate.crashing.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id 418IgDCS018668; Thu, 8 Feb 2024 12:42:13 -0600 Received: (from segher@localhost) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id 418IgCWr018667; Thu, 8 Feb 2024 12:42:12 -0600 X-Authentication-Warning: gate.crashing.org: segher set sender to segher@kernel.crashing.org using -f Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2024 12:42:12 -0600 From: Segher Boessenkool To: "Kewen.Lin" Cc: Michael Meissner , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, David Edelsohn , Peter Bergner Subject: Re: Repost [PATCH 1/6] Add -mcpu=future Message-ID: <20240208184212.GU19790@gate.crashing.org> References: <4a7b481d-8967-7f90-ad30-7df955552db8@linux.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4a7b481d-8967-7f90-ad30-7df955552db8@linux.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Wed, Feb 07, 2024 at 05:21:10PM +0800, Kewen.Lin wrote: > on 2024/2/6 14:01, Michael Meissner wrote: > > It was more as a separation. The MPCCORE, CELL, PPCA2, and TITAN are rather > > old processors. I'll probably remove Titan soonish, btw. We have adjusted code around it for what, fifteen years? But the hardware never materialized. There are more silly things in our backend, but this one takes the prize. > OK, considering we only get this warning once for a simple case, I'm inclined > not to keep a static variable for it, it's the same as what we do currently > for option conflict errors emission. But I'm fine for either. Whatever is easiest. Segher