public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vineet Gupta <vineetg@rivosinc.com>
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: "Jeff Law" <jeffreyalaw@gmail.com>,
	kito.cheng@gmail.com, "Palmer Dabbelt" <palmer@rivosinc.com>,
	"Christoph Müllner" <christoph.muellner@vrull.eu>,
	"Robin Dapp" <rdapp.gcc@gmail.com>,
	gnu-toolchain@rivosinc.com, "Vineet Gupta" <vineetg@rivosinc.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] RISC-V: avoid LUI based const materialization ... [part of PR/106265]
Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 11:49:31 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240513184932.662109-2-vineetg@rivosinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240513184932.662109-1-vineetg@rivosinc.com>

Apologies for the delay in getting this out. Needed to fix one ICE
with glibc build and fresh round of testing: both testsuite and SPEC
runs (which are similar to v1 in terms of Cactu gains, but some more minor
regressions elsewhere gcc). Again those seem so small that IMHO this
should still go in.

I'll investigate those next as well as an existing weirdnes in glibc tempnam
which I spotted during the debugging.

Changes since v1 [1]
 - Tighten the main conditition to avoid stack regs as destination
   (to avoid making them potentially unaligned with -2047 addend:
    this might be OK execution/ABI wise, but undesirable/ugly still
    specially when coming from compiler codegen).
 - Ensure that first alternative is always split
 - Remove "&& 1" from split condition. That was tripping up glibc build
   with illegal operands `add s0, s0, 2048`.

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-March/647877.html

---

... if the constant can be represented as sum of two S12 values.
The two S12 values could instead be fused with subsequent ADD insn.
The helps
 - avoid an additional LUI insn
 - side benefits of not clobbering a reg

e.g.
                            w/o patch             w/ patch
long                  |                     |
plus(unsigned long i) |	li	a5,4096     |
{                     |	addi	a5,a5,-2032 | addi a0, a0, 2047
   return i + 2064;   |	add	a0,a0,a5    | addi a0, a0, 17
}                     | 	ret         | ret

NOTE: In theory not having const in a standalone reg might seem less
      CSE friendly, but for workloads in consideration these mat are
      from very late LRA reloads and follow on GCSE is not doing much
      currently.

The real benefit however is seen in base+offset computation for array
accesses and especially for stack accesses which are finalized late in
optim pipeline, during LRA register allocation. Often the finalized
offsets trigger LRA reloads resulting in mind boggling repetition of
exact same insn sequence including LUI based constant materialization.

This shaves off 290 billion dynamic instrustions (QEMU icounts) in
SPEC 2017 Cactu benchmark which is over 10% of workload. In the rest of
suite, there additional 10 billion shaved, with both gains and losses
in indiv workloads as is usual with compiler changes.

 500.perlbench_r-0 |  1,214,534,029,025 | 1,212,887,959,387 |
 500.perlbench_r-1 |    740,383,419,739 |   739,280,308,163 |
 500.perlbench_r-2 |    692,074,638,817 |   691,118,734,547 |
 502.gcc_r-0       |    190,820,141,435 |   190,857,065,988 |
 502.gcc_r-1       |    225,747,660,839 |   225,809,444,357 | <- -0.02%
 502.gcc_r-2       |    220,370,089,641 |   220,406,367,876 | <- -0.03%
 502.gcc_r-3       |    179,111,460,458 |   179,135,609,723 | <- -0.02%
 502.gcc_r-4       |    219,301,546,340 |   219,320,416,956 | <- -0.01%
 503.bwaves_r-0    |    278,733,324,691 |   278,733,323,575 | <- -0.01%
 503.bwaves_r-1    |    442,397,521,282 |   442,397,519,616 |
 503.bwaves_r-2    |    344,112,218,206 |   344,112,216,760 |
 503.bwaves_r-3    |    417,561,469,153 |   417,561,467,597 |
 505.mcf_r         |    669,319,257,525 |   669,318,763,084 |
 507.cactuBSSN_r   |  2,852,767,394,456 | 2,564,736,063,742 | <+ 10.10%
 508.namd_r        |  1,855,884,342,110 | 1,855,881,110,934 |
 510.parest_r      |  1,654,525,521,053 | 1,654,402,859,174 |
 511.povray_r      |  2,990,146,655,619 | 2,990,060,324,589 |
 519.lbm_r         |  1,158,337,294,525 | 1,158,337,294,529 |
 520.omnetpp_r     |  1,021,765,791,283 | 1,026,165,661,394 |
 521.wrf_r         |  1,715,955,652,503 | 1,714,352,737,385 |
 523.xalancbmk_r   |    849,846,008,075 |   849,836,851,752 |
 525.x264_r-0      |    277,801,762,763 |   277,488,776,427 |
 525.x264_r-1      |    927,281,789,540 |   926,751,516,742 |
 525.x264_r-2      |    915,352,631,375 |   914,667,785,953 |
 526.blender_r     |  1,652,839,180,887 | 1,653,260,825,512 |
 527.cam4_r        |  1,487,053,494,925 | 1,484,526,670,770 |
 531.deepsjeng_r   |  1,641,969,526,837 | 1,642,126,598,866 |
 538.imagick_r     |  2,098,016,546,691 | 2,097,997,929,125 |
 541.leela_r       |  1,983,557,323,877 | 1,983,531,314,526 |
 544.nab_r         |  1,516,061,611,233 | 1,516,061,407,715 |
 548.exchange2_r   |  2,072,594,330,215 | 2,072,591,648,318 |
 549.fotonik3d_r   |  1,001,499,307,366 | 1,001,478,944,189 |
 554.roms_r        |  1,028,799,739,111 | 1,028,780,904,061 |
 557.xz_r-0        |    363,827,039,684 |   363,057,014,260 |
 557.xz_r-1        |    906,649,112,601 |   905,928,888,732 |
 557.xz_r-2        |    509,023,898,187 |   508,140,356,932 |
 997.specrand_fr   |        402,535,577 |       403,052,561 |
 999.specrand_ir   |        402,535,577 |       403,052,561 |

This should still be considered damage control as the real/deeper fix
would be to reduce number of LRA reloads or CSE/anchor those during
LRA constraint sub-pass (re)runs (thats a different PR/114729.

Implementation Details (for posterity)
--------------------------------------
 - basic idea is to have a splitter selected via a new predicate for constant
   being possible sum of two S12 and provide the transform.
   This is however a 2 -> 2 transform which combine can't handle.
   So we specify it using a define_insn_and_split.

 - the initial loose "i" constraint caused LRA to accept invalid insns thus
   needing a tighter new constraint as well.

 - An additional fallback alternate with catch-all "r" register
   constraint also needed to allow any "reloads" that LRA might
   require for ADDI with const larger than S12.

Testing
--------
This is testsuite clean (rv64 only).
I'll rely on post-commit CI multlib run for any possible fallout for
other setups such as rv32.

|                                               |         gcc |          g++ |     gfortran |
| rv64imafdc_zba_zbb_zbs_zicond/  lp64d/ medlow |  41 /    17 |    8 /     3 |    7 /     2 |
| rv64imafdc_zba_zbb_zbs_zicond/  lp64d/ medlow |  41 /    17 |    8 /     3 |    7 /     2 |

I also threw this into a buildroot run, it obviously boots Linux to
userspace. bloat-o-meter on glibc and kernel show overall decrease in
staic instruction counts with some minor spot increases.
These are generally in the category of

 - LUI + ADDI are 2 byte each vs. two ADD being 4 byte each.
 - Knock on effects due to inlining changes.
 - Sometimes the slightly shorter 2-insn seq in a mult-exit function
   can cause in-place epilogue duplication (vs. a jump back).
   This is slightly larger but more efficient in execution.
In summary nothing to fret about.

| linux/scripts/bloat-o-meter build-gcc-240131/target/lib/libc.so.6 \
         build-gcc-240131-new-splitter-1-variant/target/lib/libc.so.6
|
| add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 21/49 up/down: 520/-3056 (-2536)
| Function                                     old     new   delta
| getnameinfo                                 2756    2892    +136
...
| tempnam                                      136     144      +8
| padzero                                      276     284      +8
...
| __GI___register_printf_specifier             284     280      -4
| __EI_xdr_array                               468     464      -4
| try_file_lock                                268     260      -8
| pthread_create@GLIBC_2                      3520    3508     -12
| __pthread_create_2_1                        3520    3508     -12
...
| _nss_files_setnetgrent                       932     904     -28
| _nss_dns_gethostbyaddr2_r                   1524    1480     -44
| build_trtable                               3312    3208    -104
| printf_positional                          25000   22580   -2420
| Total: Before=2107999, After=2105463, chg -0.12%

gcc/ChangeLog:
	* config/riscv/riscv.h: New macros to check for sum of two S12
	range.
	* config/riscv/constraints.md: New constraint.
	* config/riscv/predicates.md: New Predicate.
	* config/riscv/riscv.md: New splitter.
	* config/riscv/riscv.cc (riscv_reg_frame_related): New helper.
	* config/riscv/riscv-protos.h: New helper prototype.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
	* gcc.target/riscv/sum-of-two-s12-const-1.c: New test: checks
	for new patterns output.
	* gcc.target/riscv/sum-of-two-s12-const-2.c: Ditto.
	* gcc.target/riscv/sum-of-two-s12-const-3.c: New test: should not
	ICE.

Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vineetg@rivosinc.com>
---
 gcc/config/riscv/constraints.md               |  6 +++
 gcc/config/riscv/predicates.md                |  6 +++
 gcc/config/riscv/riscv-protos.h               |  1 +
 gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc                     | 11 +++++
 gcc/config/riscv/riscv.h                      | 15 +++++++
 gcc/config/riscv/riscv.md                     | 40 +++++++++++++++++
 .../gcc.target/riscv/sum-of-two-s12-const-1.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++
 .../gcc.target/riscv/sum-of-two-s12-const-2.c | 15 +++++++
 .../gcc.target/riscv/sum-of-two-s12-const-3.c | 22 +++++++++
 9 files changed, 161 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/sum-of-two-s12-const-1.c
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/sum-of-two-s12-const-2.c
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/sum-of-two-s12-const-3.c

diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/constraints.md b/gcc/config/riscv/constraints.md
index a590df545d7d..a9ee346af6f0 100644
--- a/gcc/config/riscv/constraints.md
+++ b/gcc/config/riscv/constraints.md
@@ -80,6 +80,12 @@
   (and (match_code "const_int")
        (match_test "LUI_OPERAND (ival)")))
 
+(define_constraint "MiG"
+  "const can be represented as sum of any S12 values."
+  (and (match_code "const_int")
+       (ior (match_test "IN_RANGE (ival,  2048,  4094)")
+	    (match_test "IN_RANGE (ival, -4096, -2049)"))))
+
 (define_constraint "Ds3"
   "@internal
    1, 2 or 3 immediate"
diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/predicates.md b/gcc/config/riscv/predicates.md
index e7d797d4dbf0..8948fbfc3631 100644
--- a/gcc/config/riscv/predicates.md
+++ b/gcc/config/riscv/predicates.md
@@ -428,6 +428,12 @@
 	return true;
 })
 
+(define_predicate "const_two_s12"
+  (match_code "const_int")
+{
+  return SUM_OF_TWO_S12 (INTVAL (op));
+})
+
 ;; CORE-V Predicates:
 (define_predicate "immediate_register_operand"
   (ior (match_operand 0 "register_operand")
diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-protos.h b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-protos.h
index e5aebf3fc3d5..706dc204e643 100644
--- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-protos.h
+++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-protos.h
@@ -165,6 +165,7 @@ extern bool riscv_shamt_matches_mask_p (int, HOST_WIDE_INT);
 extern void riscv_subword_address (rtx, rtx *, rtx *, rtx *, rtx *);
 extern void riscv_lshift_subword (machine_mode, rtx, rtx, rtx *);
 extern enum memmodel riscv_union_memmodels (enum memmodel, enum memmodel);
+extern bool riscv_reg_frame_related (rtx);
 
 /* Routines implemented in riscv-c.cc.  */
 void riscv_cpu_cpp_builtins (cpp_reader *);
diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc
index a1e5a014bedf..4067505270e1 100644
--- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc
@@ -7145,6 +7145,17 @@ riscv_can_eliminate (const int from ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED, const int to)
   return (to == HARD_FRAME_POINTER_REGNUM || to == STACK_POINTER_REGNUM);
 }
 
+/* Helper to determine if reg X pertains to stack.  */
+bool
+riscv_reg_frame_related (rtx x)
+{
+  return REG_P (x)
+	 && (REGNO (x) == FRAME_POINTER_REGNUM
+	     || REGNO (x) == HARD_FRAME_POINTER_REGNUM
+	     || REGNO (x) == ARG_POINTER_REGNUM
+	     || REGNO (x) == VIRTUAL_STACK_VARS_REGNUM);
+}
+
 /* Implement INITIAL_ELIMINATION_OFFSET.  FROM is either the frame pointer
    or argument pointer.  TO is either the stack pointer or hard frame
    pointer.  */
diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.h b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.h
index 58d0b09bf7d9..0d27c0d378df 100644
--- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.h
+++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.h
@@ -626,6 +626,21 @@ enum reg_class
   (((VALUE) | ((1UL<<31) - IMM_REACH)) == ((1UL<<31) - IMM_REACH)	\
    || ((VALUE) | ((1UL<<31) - IMM_REACH)) + IMM_REACH == 0)
 
+/* True if a VALUE (constant) can be expressed as sum of two S12 constants
+   (in range -2048 to 2047).
+   Range check logic:
+     from: min S12 + 1 (or -1 depending on what side of zero)
+       to: two times the min S12 value (to max out S12 bits).  */
+
+#define SUM_OF_TWO_S12_N(VALUE)						\
+  (((VALUE) >= (-2048 * 2)) && ((VALUE) <= (-2048 - 1)))
+
+#define SUM_OF_TWO_S12_P(VALUE)						\
+  (((VALUE) >= (2047 + 1)) && ((VALUE) <= (2047 * 2)))
+
+#define SUM_OF_TWO_S12(VALUE)						\
+  (SUM_OF_TWO_S12_N (VALUE) || SUM_OF_TWO_S12_P (VALUE))
+
 /* If this is a single bit mask, then we can load it with bseti.  Special
    handling of SImode 0x80000000 on RV64 is done in riscv_build_integer_1. */
 #define SINGLE_BIT_MASK_OPERAND(VALUE)					\
diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.md b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.md
index 4d6de9925572..f5dac342033e 100644
--- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.md
+++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.md
@@ -703,6 +703,46 @@
   [(set_attr "type" "arith")
    (set_attr "mode" "DI")])
 
+;; Special case of adding a reg and constant if latter is sum of two S12
+;; values (in range -2048 to 2047). Avoid materialized the const and fuse
+;; into the add (with an additional add for 2nd value). Makes a 3 insn
+;; sequence into 2 insn.
+
+(define_insn_and_split "*add<mode>3_const_sum_of_two_s12"
+  [(set (match_operand:P	 0 "register_operand" "=r,r")
+	(plus:P (match_operand:P 1 "register_operand" " r,r")
+		(match_operand:P 2 "const_two_s12"    " MiG,r")))]
+  "!riscv_reg_frame_related (operands[0])"
+{
+  /* operand matching MiG constraint is always meant to be split.  */
+  if (which_alternative == 0)
+    return "#";
+  else
+    return "add %0,%1,%2";
+}
+  ""
+  [(set (match_dup 0)
+	(plus:P (match_dup 1) (match_dup 3)))
+   (set (match_dup 0)
+	(plus:P (match_dup 0) (match_dup 4)))]
+{
+  int val = INTVAL (operands[2]);
+  if (SUM_OF_TWO_S12_P (val))
+    {
+       operands[3] = GEN_INT (2047);
+       operands[4] = GEN_INT (val - 2047);
+    }
+  else if (SUM_OF_TWO_S12_N (val))
+    {
+       operands[3] = GEN_INT (-2048);
+       operands[4] = GEN_INT (val + 2048);
+    }
+  else
+      gcc_unreachable ();
+}
+  [(set_attr "type" "arith")
+   (set_attr "mode" "<P:MODE>")])
+
 (define_expand "addv<mode>4"
   [(set (match_operand:GPR           0 "register_operand" "=r,r")
 	(plus:GPR (match_operand:GPR 1 "register_operand" " r,r")
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/sum-of-two-s12-const-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/sum-of-two-s12-const-1.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..4d6d135de5f5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/sum-of-two-s12-const-1.c
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+// TBD: This doesn't quite work for rv32 yet
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options { -march=rv64gcv -mabi=lp64d } } */
+/* { dg-skip-if "" { *-*-* } { "-O0" "-Og" "-Os" "-Oz" } } */
+
+/* Ensure that gcc doesn't generate standlone li reg, 4096.  */
+long
+plus1(unsigned long i)
+{
+   return i + 2048;
+}
+
+long
+plus2(unsigned long i)
+{
+   return i + 4094;
+}
+
+long
+plus3(unsigned long i)
+{
+   return i + 2064;
+}
+
+/* Ensure that gcc doesn't generate standlone li reg, -4096.  */
+long
+minus1(unsigned long i)
+{
+   return i - 4096;
+}
+
+long
+minus2(unsigned long i)
+{
+   return i - 2049;
+}
+
+long
+minus3(unsigned long i)
+{
+   return i - 2064;
+}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {li\t[a-x0-9]+,-4096} } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {li\t[a-x0-9]+,4096} } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/sum-of-two-s12-const-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/sum-of-two-s12-const-2.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..9343b43c3106
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/sum-of-two-s12-const-2.c
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+/* Reduced from glibc/stdio-common/tempnam.c.
+   Can't have invalid insn in final output:
+      add s0, sp, 2048    */
+
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options { -march=rv64gcv -mabi=lp64d -O2 } } */
+/* { dg-skip-if "" { *-*-* } { "-O0" "O1" "-Og" "-Os" "-Oz" } } */
+
+int a() {
+  char b[4096];
+  if (a(b))
+    a(b);
+}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {add\t[a-x0-9]+,sp,2048} } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/sum-of-two-s12-const-3.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/sum-of-two-s12-const-3.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..5dcab52c2610
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/sum-of-two-s12-const-3.c
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+/* Reduced version of c-c++-common/torture/builtin-convertvector-1.c.  */
+/* This should NOT ICE */
+
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+
+typedef long b __attribute__((vector_size(256 * sizeof(long))));
+typedef double c __attribute__((vector_size(256 * sizeof(double))));
+int d;
+void e(b *f, c *g) { *g = __builtin_convertvector(*f, c); }
+void h() {
+  struct {
+    b i;
+  } j;
+  union {
+    c i;
+    double a[6];
+  } k;
+  e(&j.i, &k.i);
+  if (k.a[d])
+    for (;;)
+      ;
+}
-- 
2.34.1


  reply	other threads:[~2024-05-13 18:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-13 18:49 [PATCH v2 0/2] RISC-V improve stack/array access by constant mat tweak Vineet Gupta
2024-05-13 18:49 ` Vineet Gupta [this message]
2024-05-13 20:15   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] RISC-V: avoid LUI based const materialization ... [part of PR/106265] Jeff Law
2024-05-14 18:38     ` [COMMITTED] " Vineet Gupta
2024-05-13 21:13   ` Follow up #1 (was Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] RISC-V: avoid LUI based const materialization ... [part of PR/106265]) Vineet Gupta
2024-05-13 22:47     ` Jeff Law
2024-05-13 23:08       ` Vineet Gupta
2024-05-14 22:12         ` Palmer Dabbelt
2024-05-14 23:12           ` Vineet Gupta
2024-05-13 18:49 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] RISC-V: avoid LUI based const mat in prologue/epilogue expansion [PR/105733] Vineet Gupta
2024-05-13 20:28   ` Jeff Law
2024-05-14  0:54     ` Patrick O'Neill
2024-05-14  3:36       ` Jeff Law
2024-05-14 14:51         ` Patrick O'Neill
2024-05-14 14:54           ` Jeff Law
2024-05-14 15:44           ` Jeff Law
2024-05-14 16:36             ` Vineet Gupta
2024-05-14 17:06               ` Jeff Law
2024-05-20 16:44             ` epilogue expansion alloca codepath (was Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] RISC-V: avoid LUI based const mat in prologue/epilogue expansion [PR/105733]) Vineet Gupta

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240513184932.662109-2-vineetg@rivosinc.com \
    --to=vineetg@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=christoph.muellner@vrull.eu \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gnu-toolchain@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=jeffreyalaw@gmail.com \
    --cc=kito.cheng@gmail.com \
    --cc=palmer@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=rdapp.gcc@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).